It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Concerns regarding high rates of teacher stress and burnout are present globally. Yet there is limited current data regarding the severity of stress, or the role of intrapersonal and environmental factors in relation to teacher stress and burnout within the Australian context. The present study, conducted over an 18-month period, prior to the COVID pandemic, surveyed 749 Australian teachers to explore their experience of work-related stress and burnout; differences in stress and burnout across different demographic groups within the profession; as well as the contributing role of intrapersonal and environmental factors, particularly, emotion regulation, subjective well-being, and workload. Results showed over half of the sample reported being very or extremely stressed and were considering leaving the profession, with early career teachers, primary teachers, and teachers working in rural and remote areas reporting the highest stress and burnout levels. Conditional process analyses highlighted the importance of emotion regulation, workload and subjective well-being in the development of teacher stress and some forms of burnout. Implications for educational practice are discussed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 The University of Queensland, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
2 The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
3 The University of Queensland, School of Education, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
4 The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)