It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite the successes of the Standard Model of particle physics, it is known to suffer from a number of deficiencies. Several of these can be addressed within non-supersymmetric theories of grand unification based on . However, achieving gauge coupling unification in such theories is known to require additional physics below the unification scale, such as symmetry breaking in multiple steps. Many such models are disfavored due to bounds on the proton lifetime. Corrections arising from threshold effects can, however, modify these conclusions. We analyze all seven relevant breaking chains with one intermediate symmetry breaking scale, assuming the “survival hypothesis” for the scalar masses. Two are allowed by proton lifetime and two are disfavored by a failure to unify the gauge couplings. The remaining three unify at a too low scale, but can be salvaged by various amounts of threshold corrections. We parametrize this and thereby rank the models by the size of the threshold corrections required to save them.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Università di Roma Tre, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.8509.4) (ISNI:0000000121622106)
2 AlbaNova University Center, Department of Physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.411313.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 3288); AlbaNova University Center, The Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.411313.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 3288); University of Iceland, Science Institute, Reykjavík, Iceland (GRID:grid.14013.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0640 0021)
3 AlbaNova University Center, Department of Physics, School of Engineering Sciences, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.411313.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 3288); AlbaNova University Center, The Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.411313.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 3288)