It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lithosphere extension, which plays an essential role in plate tectonics, occurs both in continents (as rift systems) and oceans (spreading along mid-oceanic ridges). The northern Red Sea area is a unique natural geodynamic laboratory, where the ongoing transition from continental rifting to oceanic spreading can be observed. Here, we analyze travel time data from a merged catalogue provided by the Egyptian and Saudi Arabian seismic networks to build a three-dimensional model of seismic velocities in the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the northern Red Sea and surroundings. The derived structures clearly reveal a high-velocity anomaly coinciding with the Red Sea basin and a narrow low-velocity anomaly centered along the rift axis. We interpret these structures as a transition of lithospheric extension from continental rifting to oceanic spreading. The transitional lithosphere is manifested by a dominantly positive seismic anomaly indicating the presence of a 50–70-km-thick and 200–300-km-wide cold lithosphere. Along the forming oceanic ridge axis, an elongated low-velocity anomaly marks a narrow localized nascent spreading zone that disrupts the transitional lithosphere. Along the eastern margins of the Red Sea, several low-velocity anomalies may represent crustal zone of massive Cenozoic basaltic magmatism.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 King Saud University, Natural Hazards and Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.56302.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1773 5396); National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Seismology Department, Helwan, Egypt (GRID:grid.459886.e)
2 Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia (GRID:grid.415877.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2254 1834); Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia (GRID:grid.4605.7) (ISNI:0000000121896553); Institute of Volcanology and Seismology FEB RAS, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia (GRID:grid.465510.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0638 1430)
3 ETH Zurich, Department of Earth Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland (GRID:grid.5801.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2156 2780)
4 King Saud University, Natural Hazards and Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.56302.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1773 5396)
5 King Abdulaziz City of Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (GRID:grid.452562.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8808 6435)