It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Los proyectos urbanos en Colombia no han sido exitosos en alcanzar objetivos sociales o los propios del ordenamiento urbano. Aquí se propone que con algunos instrumentos financieros -como el patrimonio autónomo- de gestión del suelo y de participación en plusvalía de la Ley 388 de 1997 es posible usar las rentas del suelo para alcanzar mejores dotaciones urbanas y vivienda de interés social, bajo el principio del reparto equitativo de cargas y beneficios. La plusvalía como impuesto pigoviano corrige las distorsiones del mercado, y el patrimonio autónomo reasigna derechos de propiedad para alcanzar los objetivos públicos y privados.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer