It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
In pre-hospital emergency care, decisions regarding patient non-conveyance emerged as significant determinants of healthcare outcomes and resource utilization. These complex decisions became integral to the progress of emergency medical services, thus warranting an evolving exploration within the medical discourse.
Objectives and methods
This narrative review aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate various theoretical stances on patient non-conveyance in the pre-hospital emergency. The focus on studies published between January 2012 and August 2022 was intentional to capture contemporary practices and insights. PubMed and Google Scholar served as the primary databases for the investigation, while the AL-Rayyan® software facilitated a thorough screening process.
Results and discussion
Twenty-nine studies—encompassing articles, books, and theses—were discovered through our search, each presenting unique perspectives on patient non-transport, thus highlighting its criticality as a healthcare concern. Predominant factors influencing non-transport decisions were classified into patient-initiated refusals (PIR), clinician-initiated decisions (CID), and dispatcher-initiated decisions (DID).
Conclusions
The issue of patient non-conveyance to hospitals continues to pose a crucial challenge to the seamless operation of emergency healthcare systems, warranting increased attention from various healthcare entities. To comprehend and pinpoint potential areas of improvement, a comprehensive analysis of pre-hospital non-transport events is imperative. A well-informed, strategic approach could prevent resource waste while ensuring patients receive the required and definitive care.
Key messages
Why is this topic important?
Some studies have suggested that non-transport to hospitals following emergency calls is safe. However, it is a concerning issue for health systems. It is also considered a key performance metric for health systems.
What does this review attempt to show?
This review aimed to map the various factors discussed in the literature regarding the decisions not to transport patients following emergency calls in a pre-hospital setting.
What are the key findings?
The existing theories regarding non-transport to hospitals after the provision of emergency care in the pre-hospital setting were identified. Non-transport due to non-clinical decisions jeopardizes emergency care outcomes for paediatric and elderly patients in particular. Hence, further research is required to identify and control the factors governing these decisions.
How is patient care impacted?
The decisions regarding patient transport following emergency calls in a pre-hospital setting are crucial for patient outcomes. They could impact the pre-hospital emergency care outcomes as well as patient safety. They can also affect the emergency services resources’ ability to respond to other critical emergencies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.413548.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0571 546X); University of Sfax, Faculty of Sciences, Sfax, Tunisia (GRID:grid.412124.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 5644); University of Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse “Ibn El Jazzar”, Sousse, Tunisia (GRID:grid.7900.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2114 4570)
2 Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.413548.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0571 546X)
3 Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.413548.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0571 546X); University of Hertfordshire, School of Health and Social Work, Hatfield, UK (GRID:grid.5846.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2161 9644); Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.416973.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0582 4340); Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK (GRID:grid.42629.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2196 5555)
4 Hamad Medical Corporation, Department of Nursing, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.413548.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0571 546X)
5 Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, Doha, Qatar (GRID:grid.413548.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0571 546X); Durban University of Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban, South Africa (GRID:grid.412114.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9360 9165)
6 University of Sfax, Higher Institute of Biotechnology, Sfax, Tunisia (GRID:grid.412124.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 5644)
7 University of Sfax, Faculty of Medicine, Sfax, Tunisia (GRID:grid.412124.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 5644)