1. Nanonutraceuticals 1.1. Nutraceuticals
Beside the emerging need for natural origin alternatives to pharmaceuticals, the interest is focusing more and more on possible applications of food derived products that can be used as tools to prevent (and in some cases also cure) or delay the onset of a health issue [1,2,3]. Nutraceuticals, are a novel toolbox not completely explored so far for its full potential in medicine [4,5,6,7]. Nutraceuticals, a portmanteau of the words ‘nutrition’ and ‘pharmaceutical’ [2], have been defined as “the phytocomplex if they derive from a food of vegetal origin, and as the pool of the secondary metabolites if they derive from a food of animal origin, concentrated and administered in the more suitable pharmaceutical form” [8]. Examples of substances that have nutritional and nutraceutical interest are antioxidants, vitamins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, dietary fibres, prebiotics, and probiotics [9]. Nutraceuticals reside nowadays in a gray area between pharmaceuticals and food; their safety and efficacy in health conditions and safety must be substantiated by clinical data; moreover, there is lack of a shared regulatory system for them [7,10].
1.2. From Nanopharmaceuticals to Nanonutraceuticals
1.2.1. Characteristics of Nanoparticles and General Classification
Within the different definitions of nanomaterials, these can be described as the products of nanotechnology, characterized by at least one dimension within the size range below 100 nanometers [11,12,13]. Due to their remarkable properties and versatility, nanomaterials are being exploited in different fields, e.g., agriculture, health, electronics, cosmetics [14,15,16,17,18], representing a great challenge, in particular, in food science and technology, environment, and human health [19]. The progress in pharmaceutical nanotechnology has led to a new class of products, the so-called nanopharmaceuticals [20,21], defined as pharmaceutical drug molecules formulated in nanomaterials. Different types of nanoformulations are being exploited for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, infectious diseases, and others [22,23,24,25,26]. Besides, nanomaterials are also succeeding in offering new advanced tools for imaging and diagnosis [27] which, combined with therapy, have been proposed as nanotheranostics. These formulations are also being tailored for personalized medicine.
Nanoparticles can be produced from natural (e.g., proteins, polysaccharides, lipids) and from synthetic (e.g., polymers) sources. Ideally, materials should be biocompatible, biodegradable, and biotolerable, namely the way by which designed materials are tolerated by the body, and of generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status, in order to be used in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products. Among the available options, and if the nanoparticles are intended for oral administration (as happens with nanonutraceuticals), lipid nanoparticles are of special interest [28,29,30,31]. Lipids are known for their role as absorption enhancers in the gut, which contribute to improving the oral bioavailability of several drugs and biomolecules. Besides this, the loading of poorly soluble drugs into lipid nanoparticles overcome the limitations encountered in their formulation into final products. Lipid nanoparticles can be produced from well-known lipids existing both in the human body and in foodstuff (e.g., fatty acids, triglycerides, phospholipids, waxes, cholesterol) thereby enhancing their biodegradability, and biocompatibility profiles [32].
Among polysaccharides, chitosan [33,34,35,36,37] and alginate [33,38,39], have been frequently used in the production of nanoparticles for oral delivery. Being a mucoadhesive polysaccharide, chitosan is able to increase cellular permeability and improves the bioavailability of orally administered drugs and proteins. Moreover, the molecule itself exhibits antimicrobial properties, and has a low toxicity. The molecule has chemical functional groups that can be modified for site specific targeting. Alginate is also a versatile mucoadhesive natural polymer with very low toxicity in vivo. Alginate nanoparticles have a hydrophilic character with improved loading capacity for hydrophilic drugs, being able to modify their release profile. Alginate nanoparticles are reported as adjuvants in vaccinations and can be produced conjugated with dextran to modify the release profile of proteins and other macromolecules intended for oral administration [40].
Nanopharmaceuticals and nanonutraceuticals are obtained, respectively, when a pharmaceutical or a nutraceutical is formulated in nanoparticles. The rationale for their development is mainly addressed to improve the physicochemical properties (e.g., solubility) and pharmacokinetic parameters (tmax, Cmax, area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUC)), with the ultimate aim to reduce the dose required to observe the therapeutic/nutraceutical outcome and thus the possible risk of toxicity [41,42,43]. Parameters, such as efficiency, quality, and safety should therefore be considered. Nevertheless, regulatory issues related to nanopharmaceuticals still need further developments [44].
1.2.2. Emerging Area of Applications
Nanopharmaceuticals and the great change of the pharmaceutical industry have a great impact also on nutraceuticals. The recent work of Agarwal et al. [45] gives the patented and approval scenario of nanopharmaceuticals with regards to biomedical application, manufacturing procedure, and safety aspects.
Wu et al. [46] highlighted how nanotherapeutics and nanopharmaceuticals could lead to a more precise individual diagnosis, improve targeted therapies, reduce side effects, and enhance therapeutic monitoring. The same review also underlines that the field of nanomedicine is at its early stage and that further efforts to translate their potential into clinical trials and medical practice are still needed.
A growing number of studies are addressed towards the application of nanotechnologies to nutraceuticals [47,48,49,50] in order to obtain improved bioavailability, delivery, and effect. This leads to the development of an emerging area of innovative products: the nanonutraceuticals [51,52,53].
Nanotechnology can be used to improve absorption, bioavailability, stability, and controlled release of nutrients and nutraceuticals, thereby increasing health benefits; some examples of potential advantages of applications of nanotechnology on the nutraceuticals are (i) efficient encapsulation; (ii) smart delivery and release from a nanoformulation. For example, research on encapsulation of nutraceuticals into biodegradable, environmentally friendly nanocarriers, is ongoing to increase their absorption and their therapeutic potential.
The nanonutraceutical formulations represent a valuable and promising strategy to maintain nutraceutical health beneficial properties at a nano level, to guarantee safety and efficacy, when used in managing health conditions, particularly for patients who are not eligible for a conventional pharmacological therapy. Follow-up studies, as reported by recent works [54,55,56,57], and communication strategies [58], are needed for both the nanopharmaceuticals and nanonutraceuticals [59,60], in view of expanding the area of interest to different health conditions. For instance, Aditya et al. [61] describe the current status of the various delivery systems that are used for the delivery of hydrophilic bioactive compounds and discuss future prospects to be explored for the delivery of hydrophilic bioactive compoundse.g., niosomes, bilosomes, cubosomes.
2. Focus on Nanotechnologies Applied to Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics Focus of this perspective is the application of nanotechnologies to food supplements containing prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics. This section consists of (i) shot on prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics; (ii) definition and delineation of nano-prebiotics, nano-probiotics, and nano-synbiotics. 2.1. An Overview on Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics
2.1.1. Prebiotics
Prebiotics [62,63,64,65,66] are a special form of dietary fiber with health benefits, which invoke alterations in the host microbial ecosystem, not only in the gut, via their selective administration by live host microbes [67]. Food ingredients like prebiotics are classified on the basis of some principles, such as resistance to digestion in upper alimentary tract, selective stimulation of probiotic growth, beneficial health effects in the host, stability in different conditions of food/feed processing, and fermentation process through intestinal microbiota. They are found in various sources, including some non-digestible oligosaccharides, non-digestible carbohydrates, yacon, unrefined wheat, unrefined barley, soybeans, raw oats, breast milk, and inulin sources (e.g., chicory roots and Jerusalem artichoke) [68]. Some compounds found in prebiotics are soya-oligosaccharide, xylo-oligosaccharide, pyrodextrins, gluco-oligosaccharide, lactulose, malto-oligosaccharide, galactans (galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS)), oligofructose, isomalto-oligosaccharide (IOS), fructans (FOS and inulin), mannan-oligosaccharide (MOS), lactitol, and non-starch polysaccharides (NSP). Figure 1 gives an overview of prebiotics.
Several mechanisms are involved in the bioactivity of prebiotics and probiotics [69,70], as described in Figure 2.
The metabolic products of such microorganisms can drop the gastrointestinal (GI) pH by carbohydrate fermentation via Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus thereby influencing mineral uptake, growth, and spread of gut microbiota, epithelial integrity, and hormonal regulation. They also are able to enhance the absorption of trace elements and especially of iron and act on the regulation of body immune function. The prebiotics can use the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as an energy source.
2.1.2. Probiotics
The FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and WHO (World Health Organization) have defined probiotics as non-pathogenic living microorganisms that ensure host health if used properly in foods or as dietary supplements [71,72]. Probiotics come from different sources, such as various natural environments, human gut microbiota, and foods. The main properties of probiotics like the ability to survive through the gastrointestinal tract, the resistance against bile and gastric acidity, and the stimulation of the activity of bile salt hydrolase, promote health benefits to the host [68,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]. The count of probiotic bacteria (colony-forming units (CFU)/g) in probiotic-containing products differ among the countries; for example, 107 CFU/g in the USA and 109 CFU/g in Canada. The effective dose generally contains >106–108 CFU/g or >108–1010 CFU/d of live probiotic bacteria [82,83]. Most probiotics are found in Gram-positive bacteria, including Streptococcus, Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus. The probiotics can also include fungal and yeast species such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces. Only some microorganisms such as Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactococcus are known as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) despite the existence of diverse microorganisms which can act as probiotics with health benefits [84,85,86]. Figure 3 gives an overview of probiotics.
The reported key mechanisms of action of probiotics [87] have been mentioned as follows (see Figure 2): enhancement of epithelial barrier, modulation of insulin-sensitive tissues, synthesis of antimicrobial substances, multi-pathogen competition, and induction of mucin secretion. The probiotics are able to adhere to epithelium, resulting in microbial elimination. They also modulate the immune function via the stimulation of signaling pathways to upregulate anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, to differentiate T-regulatory cells (Tregs), and to interact with the gut-brain axis (GBA) by endocrine regulation and neurologic functions.
2.1.3. Synbiotics
The synbiotic agents are a combination of prebiotics and probiotics with beneficial effects on host through the enhancement of activity and survival of beneficial microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract, so that they can selectively provoke the growth and stimulate the metabolism of one or more health-promoting bacteria, thereby enhancing the host welfare [88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. The most important issue in the design of synbiotics resides in the prebiotic and probiotic selection criteria and requirements, which should be clearly described.
2.1.4. Health Promoting Effect of Prebiotics, Probiotics, and Synbiotics
The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) introduced a wide range of products containing the probiotics with health promoting effects, including non-edible products (e.g., vaginal preparations), baby formulas (e.g., first milk), drugs, therapeutic supplements (e.g., for enteral nutrition), and foods (e.g., fermented milk with reportedly health beneficial effects) [98].
Some of the reported beneficial effects of probiotics in human health include anticancer [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111], anti-allergic [112,113], anti-diabetic [114,115,116], anti-obesity [117,118,119,120], anti-pathogenic [121,122], immunomodulatory [123], and anti-inflammatory [124,125,126,127] activities [128], as reported in Table 1. In an in vitro study, Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH-MS) as a quantitative analysis technique was applied to evaluate the proteomic profile of colon cancer cells in Lactobacillus kefiri SGL 13, and the results indicated antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic activities for this strain on human colon adenocarcinoma cell line HT29 [99]. In another study, the airway hyper reactivity was suppressed in ovalbumin-sensitized samples by Lactobacillus spp. (such as Lactobacillus and Pediococcus) via a reduction in the level of Th2 cytokines, OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 as well as an increase in the level of IgG2a [112]. Lactobacillus fermentum cell-free supernatant (LCFS) caused cancer cell death in 3D HCT-116 conditions through the induction of apoptosis in the colon cancer cell line and the antiproliferative activity by the inhibition of NF-κB signaling [129]. The use of lactoferrin and Bifidobacterium longum BB536 managed the enteropathy caused by diclofenac in rat samples by modulating the proinflammatory pathway of TLR-2/-4/NF-kB [130]. Othman et al. [131], studied the effect of inactivated Bifidobacterium longum intake on obese diabetes affected mice. They reported a significant decrease of body weight gain, adipose tissue mass and blood glucose levels, as well as a significant reduction in blood glucose after a 5 weeks treatment. The treatment also resulted in reduced levels of cholesterol and triglycerides [131].
The administration of three strains of Bifidobacteria in the adult rats improved neuronal plasticity and cognitive behavior [132].
Prebiotics have been reported to have different activities; for example, generation of bacteriocins, maintenance of gut health [133], possibility to be used as food additive and starter culture, clearance of cholesterol [134,135], potentiation of immune defense [136], inhibition of constipation and risk of obesity [137,138], inhibition of colitis [139], protection of colon and other organs against cancer [140,141,142], reduction of cardiovascular disease risk factors, antioxidant activity [143,144], over-bioavailability [145]. According to scientific published data, the administration of oligofructose-enriched inulin (OEI) promotes malondialdehyde content, lipid profile, glycemic indices, and antioxidant level in female patients suffering from type II diabetes [146]. The supplementation of inulin in shaken cultures was found to increase the growth rate of L. plantarum ST16 [147]. Based on the findings from Ramos et al. [148], the administration of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) was tolerated and decreased the total and free p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) in the serum samples of patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).
The therapeutic potential of synbiotics has been comprehensively discussed in a recent review published by Flesch et al. [149]. According to their findings, the patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) when receiving B. longum BB536 and L. rhamnosus HN001 plus vitamin B6 showed restoration of intestinal permeability and gut microbiota, as well as amelioration of the disease symptoms [150]. In the research of Mohan et al., the synbiotic AMFTM 15+ manuka honey yogurt showed antibacterial properties, followed by increasing probiotic bacteria and producing lactic and propionic acids [151]. A study reported gut health enhancement following the administration of seaweed-based synbiotic of Gracilaria coronopifolia which caused the reduction of inflammation, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and diminution of the oxidative stress-induced cell damage [152]. According to Sarwar et al., the textural properties, such as adhesiveness, cohesiveness, and hardness, were enhanced following the co-administration of inulin and Saccharomyces boulardii [153]. In Table 1 an updated overview of in vitro and in vivo studies on prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic products is given.
2.2. Nano-Prebiotics, Nano-Probiotics, and Nano-Synbiotics
Recently, emerging applications of nanotechnologies in prebiotics and probiotics have been developed and carried out as reported in Table 2 [154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167].
Caneus et al. [168] remarked how nanomedicine, together with the known practices of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics, represents a valuable approach in creating an optimal environment within the gastrointestinal tract.
Exploring the nanonization strategies of probiotics and the utility of nanoprobiotics in the delivery of encapsulated bacteria is being carried out. For encapsulation of probiotic have been used mainly nanoparticles i.e., with of selenium and gold particles of a size in the range 10–1000 nm; nanolayers, consisting of at least three layers of a charged polyelectrolyte, a polymeric layer, and a functionalized polysaccharide or polyether; nanoemulsions consisting of a liquid phase dispersion in another liquid phase with droplet size less 200 nm; nanobeads (nanosized bacteria-enabled autonomous delivery system) and emerging product of nanofibers [169]. The best technique for probiotics encapsulation was mainly chosen for protecting the cells against an adverse environment in the gastrointestinal tract, in order to allow their release in a viable and metabolically active state in the intestine [170].
Kazmierczak et al. [171] describe an innovative engineering approach to load such nanoparticles onto a biological “mailman” (a novel, nontoxic, therapeutic strain of Salmonella typhimurium engineered to preferentially and precisely seek out, penetrate, and hinder prostate cancer cells as biological delivery system) that will deliver the therapeutics to a target site. Another example of probiotic bacteria encapsulated with nanoparticles was given by Hu et al. [172] that showed how coating live bacterial cells with synthetic nanoparticles represents a promising strategy to engineer efficient and versatile DNA vaccines. Feher et al. [173] have reported the use of nano-sized particles of probiotics for preventing and treating neuroinflammation.
Probiotics are indeed receiving special interest as an alternative to the classical antibiotics to overcome bacterial resistance. As prebiotics enhance the activity of probiotics, Kim et al. [162] proposed the development of a prebiotic formulation composed of Pediococcus acidilactidi loaded in phthalyl dextran nanoparticles by conjugating phthalic anhydride with dextran [162]. The authors evaluated the cellular effects of the produced nanomaterial and checked the antimicrobial properties of the probiotics. The loading of P. acidilactidi into phthalyl dextran nanoparticles was found to enhance the production of antimicrobial peptides by probiotics by a self-defense mechanism, with improved antimicrobial effect against Gram (+) and Gram (−) micro-organisms compared to the probiotics alone. The same authors previously reported that prebiotic phthalyl inulin nanoparticles could also enhance the antimicrobial activities of P. acidilactici [174].
Hong et al. also reported the enhanced antimicrobial activity of phthalyl pullulan nanoparticles treated with L. plantarum against Escherichia coli K99 and Listeria monocytogenes [164]. The nanoparticles were internalized into the L. plantarum by an energy-dependent and galactose transporter-dependent mechanism and a higher amount of plantaricin, a natural antibacterial peptide, was secreted from the developed nanoprobiotic than from probiotic alone.
The use of spores from probiotics have been recently proposed as a delivery system for chemotherapeutic drugs. Song et al. [175] produced deoxycholic acid-modified spores to be loaded with doxorubicin and sorafenib as an approach for autonomous production of nanoparticles in the gastrointestinal tract. Such approach envisions drug protection upon oral administration to improve bioavailability. Besides, the release is based on the disintegrated hydrophobic protein and the hydrophilic deoxycholic acid with enhanced uptake by the epithelial cells via the bile acid pathway, increasing basolateral drug release.
The anticancer activity of silver/Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG nanoparticles was described by Aziz et al. [155]. Using the MTT assay, the authors demonstrated that the viability of HT-29 cell lines has been significantly reduced when applying the highest tested nanoparticle concentration, leading to apoptosis. The method of synthesizing silver/Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG nanoparticles was also found to be cost-effective, offering a viable nanoprobiotic approach for biomedical applications.
It is worth mentioning the work of Fung et al. [176] where, by investigating the agrowaste-based nanofibers as a probiotic encapsulant, has proposed the use of nanofibers for the nanoencapsulation of L. acidophilus using 8% poly(vinyl alcohol) to produce nanofibers by electrospinning technology. The authors suggested how thermal behavior of nanofibers suggested possible thermal protection of probiotics in heat-processed foods. Nagy et al. [177] by investigating the suitability of electrospinning for biodrugs delivery to produce vaginal drug delivery systems, concluded how nanofibers can provide long term stability for huge amounts of living bacteria if they are kept at (or below) 7 °C. The recent work of Zupancic et al. [178], who studied the incorporation of a range of safe lactic acid bacteria into poly(ethylene oxide)-based nanofibers, evidenced that all of the lactic acid bacteria were viable after incorporation into nanofibers, with 0–3 log CFU/mg loss in viability, depending on the species. Moreover, the authors reported that viability can be correlated with the hydrophobicity and to the extreme length of lactic acid bacteria, whereas a horizontal or vertical electrospinning set-up did not have any role. Development of nanofibers via electrospinning has a great potential and use in pharmaceutical and food industry for their properties i.e., sterile nature, biocompatibility, adhesiveness, efficiency, and as vehicle for controlled and sustained release in drug delivery [179,180,181,182]. Electrospinning and electrospraying represent innovative technologies for the delivery of nutraceuticals [183].
An example of nanolayers coated probiotics has been given by Franz et al. [184] who developed layer-by-layer nano self-assembly coating of Allochromatium vinosum with different polyelectrolyte combinations and investigated substrate uptake in bacteria: surface charge neither affected sulfide uptake nor the contact formation between the cells and solid sulfur, whereas increasing layers slowed or inhibited the uptake of sulfide and elemental sulfur.
The recent work of Ebrahimnejad et al. [185] described the use of chitosan for nanoencapsulation of L. acidophilus as probiotic bacteria, by concluding how nanoencapsulation of probiotic bacteria represents a promising strategy in enhancing the viability and survival of them against gastro-intestinal environmental conditions.
Ranjan et al. [186] reported physicochemical characterization and potential prebiotic effect of whey protein isolate/inulin nano complex.
Atia et al. [167] developed an encapsulated oral-symbiotic supplement by studying the effect of adding inulin in alginate beads and observed their ability to protect three probiotic strains, namely, P. acidilactici, L. reuteri, and L. salivarius. The antimicrobial and probiotic properties of bacterial strains were found not to be affected by the encapsulation.
Krithika and Preetha [166] have developed a protein-based inulin incorporated symbiotic nanoemulsion for enhanced stability of probiotic; whey protein concentrate/inulin nano complex can be recommended as a delivery system for various probiotics in food products.
Salmerón et al. [187] reported the development fermented beverages with synbiotic properties, and the incorporation of nanoparticles with unique and specific bioactivity, to improve organoleptic characteristics, absorption, and delivery of nutrients and bioactive compounds which has opened a new horizon in this segment of food created to improve human health and well-being.
Formulation of protein-based inulin incorporated synbiotic nanoemulsion for enhanced stability of probiotic are currently studied extensively.
It is worth mentioning the work of Rezaee et al. [188] that investigated the antimicrobial activity of Ag and TiO2 nano-particles on three species of Lactobacillus i.e., L. casei ATCC 39392, L. plantarum ATCC 8014, and L. fermentum ATCC 9338 in the presence and absence of raffinose, lactulose, and inulin, respectively. The results indicated that silver nanoparticles decreased 85%, 85%, and 71% of L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. fermentum, respectively, after 48 h and decreased percentages of L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. fermentum that were 16%, 64%, and 4% in the presence of the prebiotics. Nano TiO2 particles decreased 59%, 85%, and 61% of L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. fermentum, respectively, after 48 h, and decreased percentages of L. casei, L. plantarum, and L. fermentum which were 16%, 2%, and 4% in the presence of these prebiotics.
The treatment of gastrointestinal disorders (e.g., diarrhea) using nanoprobiotics is also a relatively unexplored field. Khan et al. [189] aimed at quantifying the concentration of nanomaterials commercialized in chocolates and evaluated their effect on a commercial probiotic formulation (containing Bacillus coagulans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium) usually used to treat diarrhea in children [189]. The known probiotic activities, such as acid production, biofilm formation, growth, and antibiotic resistance were observed from isolated bacteria, while the isolated titanium oxide nanoparticles from chocolates were shown to inhibit the growth and activity of the probiotic formulation in a concentration range of 125–500 µg/mL in vitro [189]. The outcomes of this study concluded that TiO2 in chocolate discourages the survival of probiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract.
To trace target probiotics in situ and in real-time, Liu et al. [190] developed an in vivo probing strategy using persistent luminescence nanophosphors surface-modified by plasmid-like DNA as optical labelling and background-free fluorescence bioimaging as signal readout. The surface modification with DNA molecules was shown to promote the nanoparticles penetration into the bacteria and facilitated in vivo bioimaging. Such an approach opens new research perspectives in terms of food safety making use of nanotechnologies.
3. Conclusions
Only a few experimental studies are present in literature on nanoprebiotics and nanoprobiotics, while studies on this prominent issue are needed, covering effectiveness and safety aspects as it has been developed for pharmaceuticals. The potential of nanotechnologies in the food area is an emerging challenge as well as the nanonutraceuticals, which are an emerging field of study in the nutraceuticals area. Safety and regulatory aspects should be considered to depict the potentiality of nanoprobiotics and nanoprebiotics. Nanoformulation should be accompanied with regulatory requirements to ensure efficacy, safety, and authorization procedures. As a general guideline, the European Authority for Food Safety (EFSA) [191] has developed an approach for assessing the potential risks arising from the applications of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. Regarding prebiotics and probiotics, McClements and Xiao [192] developed a summary of the possible applications of inorganic and organic nanoparticles in foods, a description of the nanoparticle characteristics, and discussed the importance of the food matrix and gastrointestinal tract effects on nanoparticle properties as well as potential possible toxicity mechanisms of different food-grade nanoparticles. The same authors concluded, however, that many of these nanoparticles are unlikely to have adverse-side effects on human health in line with previously reported data [193]. Nonetheless, in order to assess the effective use of food-grade nanoparticles, further studies are expected to exploit and assess safety, improved bioavailability, and efficacy.
| Type | Microorganisms/Prebiotics | Activity | Study | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Bacillus and Enterobacter | Anticancer and antioxidant effect | The intracellular cell-free supernatants (CFS) from Bacillus licheniformis KT921419 and the ethyl acetate extracts could control the growth of HT-29, a colon cancer cell line | [100] |
| L. plantarum C70 | Anticancer effect | L. plantarum C70 by releasing the exopolysaccharide caused 73.1% and 88.1% cytotoxic properties against the breast and colon cancers, respectively | [101] | |
| Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii | Anticancer effect | According to analysis of Annexin V/PI and DAPI, an apoptotic induction was observed due to exopolysaccharides released by probiotic yeasts of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii | [102] | |
| Lactobacilli cocktail | Anticancer effect | HT-29, a human colorectal carcinoma cell line was controlled by Lactobacilli cocktail via the modulation of the Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways | [104] | |
| L. rhamnosus | Anticancer effect | The bioconversion of cranberry proanthocyanidins to Lactobacillus rhamnosus could result in the IC50 values of 20.1 and 47.8 μg/mL | [105] | |
| Bifidobacterium infantis, L. acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus | Anti-inflammatory effect | A mixture of aerobic probiotics improved the functions of various intestinal barriers and the restoration of lucrative intestinal microbiota in the mouse model of DSS-induced chronic colitis, meaning anti-inflammatory properties | [127] | |
| Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 | Anti-inflammatory effect | The inflammatory response was modulated in mucositis caused by 5-FU (fluorouracil) via the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 through the control of TLR 2 and 4 as well as the reduction of pro-inflammatory and NF-κB cytokines | [103] | |
| L. casei IMAU60214 | Immunomodulatory effect | The use of L. casei IMAU60214 killed by heat increased the activity of M1-like pro-inflammatory phenotype through the TLR2 signaling pathway | [123] | |
| L. plantarum | Antimicrobial effect | L. plantarum ZLP001 impeded the ETEC adhesion and linked with IPEC-J2 cells via the competition and exclusion | [122] | |
| Lactobacillus | Anti-diabetic effect | The lactobacillus strain alleviated the levels of blood sugar and HbA1c in diabetic rats | [115] | |
| L. plantarum LMT1-48 | Anti-obesity effect | The body weight and abdominal fat content were decreased in mouse models fed a modified diet through the administration of L. plantarum LMT1-48 at a density of 106 CFU/mL | [117] | |
| Hafnia alvei | Anti-obesity effect | Fat mass, food intake, and body weights were reduced in the mouse model of obesity and hyperphagia | [118] | |
| Eurotium cristatum | Anti-obesity effect | The administration of Eurotium cristatum showed anti-obesity activity in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) through the modulation of gut microbiota | [119] | |
| L. plantarum strain TCI378 | Anti-obesity | The expression of glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT-4) and adipocyte-specific genes perilipin 1 was suppressed by metabolism derivatives from L. plantarum strain TCI378 | [120] | |
| Prebiotic | Galacto-oligosaccharides and phycocyanin | Anticancer effect | The prebiotics co-administered by phycocyanin arrested the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase, resulting in inhibited growth of HCT116 cells | [141] |
| Chondroitin Sulfate Disaccharide | Anticancer effect | The growth of HT-29, human colon cancer cell line, was controlled by Chondroitin sulfate (CS)-Keel disaccharide (CSD) generated by chondroitin AC lyase, estimating at 80% antiproliferative activity | [140] | |
| Short-chain fatty acids | Antiproliferative effects | The administration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) prevented the expression of genes involved in human colorectal cancer cells | [142] | |
| Blueberry anthocyanins | Antioxidant effect | The density and composition of intestinal microbiota in human models were increased by consumption of high purity blueberry anthocyanins through the increase in the modulatory and prebiotic activities | [143] | |
| Oligosaccharides | Antioxidant effect | The water-soluble oligosaccharide of EMOS-1a showed 1420% proliferation level | [144] | |
| Lycium barbarum polysaccharide | Immunomodulation effect | The administration of polysaccharides derived from Lycium barbarum in mice showed immunomodulatory effects, and enhanced density of beneficial bacteria and gut microbiota | [136] | |
| Synbiotic | Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) with L. acidophilus | Anticancer effect | The co-administration of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) and Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibited the growth of rat colon cancer cells through the promotion of apoptosis, proliferation, and inflammation | [80] |
| L. casei, acidophilus, rhamnosus, bulgaricus, Bifidobacterium breve, longum and Streptococcus thermophilus with fructo-oligosaccharides. | Anticancer and antioxidant effect | Ten weeks of low-calorie diet program along with synbiotic supplementation enhanced the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduced the serum level of malondialdehyde (MDA) in obese patients suffering from breast cancer-related lymphedema | [89] | |
| Weissella cibaria FB069 with xylooligosaccharides | Anticancer effect | The use of synbiotic-fermented soymilk (containing xylooligosaccharides and Weissella cibaria FB069) inhibited the proliferation of HCT116 and Caco-2, colorectal cancer cell lines, through the reduction in the transcription of MD2/TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB | [90] | |
| Auricularia auricula aqueous with L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-12 | Antioxidant effect | The aqueous extract of Auricularia auricula in the presence of L. acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-12 significantly elevated the level of phenolic compounds and the activity of antioxidant properties up to 1057.6 mg of Gallic acid/kg and 115.30 of mg BHT eq/kg following 28-day storage | [91] | |
| L. bulgaricus PXN 39, L. casei subsp. casei PXN 37, Bifidobacterium breve PXN 25, L. rhamnosus PXN 54, B. infantis PXN 27 Lactobacillus acidophilus PXN 35, Streptococcus thermophilus PXN 66 with fructo-oligosaccharides | Immunomodulation effect | The use of multispecies symbiotic showed immunoregulatory effects on the expression levels of CD4 and IgA in mice exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) | [92] | |
| L. plantarum with inulin | Neuropsychological effect | Concomitant administration of inulin and L. plantarum in diabetic rats improved CREB/BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway, serotonin secretion, brain parameters, intestinal microbial composition, and oxidative stress, thus leading to improved memory and learning disorders | [93] | |
| β-glucan, Bacillus coagulans, and inulin, lactic acid | Anti-diabetic effect | Eight weeks of taking daily synbiotic plus lactic acid improved the levels of GSH-Px, SOD and HbA1c in patients with type II diabetes | [94] | |
| Corn starch, maltodextrin, inulin, fructooligosaccharides, potassium chloride, magnesium sulfate, mangan sulfate with L. casei W56, acidophilus W22, paracasei W20, salivarius W24, plantarum W62, Lactococcus lactis W19, Bifidobacterium lactis W51 and W52, and Bifidobacterium bifidum W23 | Improve symptoms of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome | Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms were improved by synbiotic treatment through an increase in fecal acetate and butyrate, colonic CD4+ T cells, mucosal microbial diversity as well as a decrease in surrogate of intestinal barrier function and fecal zonulin | [95] | |
| Grape pomace extract with lactobacilli | Anti- inflammatory effect | The co-administration of lactobacilli and prebiotic grape pomace caused a downregulation of inflammatory genes, proteins, signaling molecules through the symbiotic effects | [96] | |
| L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, B. longum and Bifidobacterium bifidum, Saccharomyces boulardii with fructo-oligosaccharides | Hepatoprotective effects | The administration of synbiotic soy yogurt controlled hypercholesterolemia in mice liver by reducing the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triacylglycerols, blood cholesterol, and lipid peroxidation. | [97] |
| Type | Activity | Study | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Antimicrobial effect | The polylysine-induced poly glutamic acid (PG) films caused protection of probiotics against food-borne pathogens | [154] |
| Anticancer effect | The high levels of synthesized silver/Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG nanoparticles (Ag-LNPs) led to a decline in the rate of HT-29 live cells | [155] | |
| Anticancer and antimicrobial effect | The fabrication of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) using L. casei could control the proliferation of HT-29, a human colon carcinoma cell line, and human gastric carcinoma cell line, as well as could eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus | [156] | |
| Anticancer and antioxidant effect | The L. casei capped-SeNPS suppressed the cytotoxicity caused by Diquat and oxidative damage, impeded the cell damage and apoptosis induced by H2O2, and induced the apoptosis mediated by the HepG2 cell line | [157] | |
| Anticancer and antioxidant effect | The findings from the administration of L. casei 393-SeNPs were the induction of HepG2 cell line apoptosis, the elevation of oxidative damage caused by Diquat in IECs, and the reduction in gut barrier dysfunction caused by ETEC K88 via the antioxidant functions, the regulation of inflammation, the establishment of gut epithelial barrier integrity, and the balance of gut microflora | [158] | |
| Anticancer effect | Dead nano-scale L. plantarum could impede the proliferation of a colorectal cancer cell line through an increase in the expression level of IgA, an induction of cancer cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and a suppression of inflammatory response | [159] | |
| Anticancer and antioxidant effect | The synthesis gold nanoparticles (AuNps) having antioxidant activity and low cytotoxicity using L. kimchicus DCY51T strain exhibited the activity of a protective protein capping layer | [160] | |
| Prebiotic | Improve drug delivery | High molecular weight (HMW) inulin nanoparticles were fabricated to achieve drug delivery system, whose concentration of <200 μg/mL had no toxicity for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) | [161] |
| Antimicrobial effect | The probiotics were internalized by phthalyl dextran nanoparticles (PDNs) to construct pediocin, aiming at the alteration of gut microbiome composition, the suppression of pathogenic intestinal infections, and the elevation of beneficial bacteria species | [162] | |
| Antimicrobial effect | The higher pediocin generation following the administration of PIN-internalized probiotics with 0.171 polydispersity index (PDI) with a size of about 203 nm showed the maximum antimicrobial properties | [163] | |
| Synbiotic | Antimicrobial effect | The activity of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli K99 was inhibited by L. plantarum exposed to phthalylpullulan nanoparticle (PPN) due to production of antimicrobial peptides via intracellular stimulation | [164] |
| The photo protective effect | A cream containing L. rhamnosus plus Selenium nanoparticles could heal the side effects induced by sunburn and showed sun protection factor (SPF) of 29.77 in Wistar rat model | [165] | |
| Improve delivery system | A new formulation of nano-emulsion containing E. faecium plus inulin could increase probiotic bacterial viability and stability | [166] | |
| Improve tolerance of probiotic bacteria | Beads reinforced by inulin (5% w/v) had the highest effect on bacterial protection against bile salts | [167] |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.D., A.N., A.S.; Methodology, M.L., E.B.S., R.C., A.S.; Validation, R.C., A.S., E.N., A.G.A., and A.D.; Writing-Review and Editing, A.N., A.D., R.C., M.L., E.B.S., A.S.; Visualization, E.N., M.L., E.B.S.; Supervision, A.D., A.S.; all Authors contributed equally to the manuscript final preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors acknowledge the support of the research project: Nutraceutica come supporto nutrizionale nel paziente oncologico, CUP: B83D18000140007. E. B. Souto acknowledges the sponsorship of the projects M-ERA-NET-0004/2015-PAIRED and UIDB/04469/2020 (strategic fund), receiving support from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation, Ministry of Science and Education (FCT/MEC) through national funds, and co-financed by FEDER, under the Partnership Agreement PT2020.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Beyond the diet before the drugs. Curr. Bioact. Comp. 2014, 10, 1-12.
2. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. To Nutraceuticals and back: Rethinking a concept. Foods 2017, 6, 74.
3. Abenavoli, L.; Izzo, A.A.; Milić, N.; Cicala, C.; Santini, A.; Capasso, R. Milk thistle (Silybum marianum): A concise overview on its chemistry, pharmacological, and nutraceutical uses in liver diseases. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 2202-2213.
4. Durazzo, A. Extractable and Non-extractable polyphenols: An overview. In Non-Extractable Polyphenols and Carotenoids: Importance in Human Nutrition and Health; Saura-Calixto, F., Pérez-Jiménez, J., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1-37.
5. Santini, A.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals-shedding light on the grey area between pharmaceuticals and food. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 11, 545-547.
6. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. A current shot and re-thinking of antioxidant research strategy. Braz. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 5, 9-11.
7. Santini, A.; Cammarata, S.M.; Capone, G.; Ianaro, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Pani, L.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: Opening the debate for a regulatory framework. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 659-672.
8. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. A decade of nutraceutical patents: Where are we now in 2018? Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2018, 28, 875-882.
9. Durazzo, A.; D'Addezio, L.; Camilli, E.; Piccinelli, R.; Turrini, A.; Marletta, L.; Marconi, S.; Lucarini, M.; Lisciani, S.; Gabrielli, P.; et al. From plant compounds to botanicals and back: A current snapshot. Molecules 2018, 23, 1844.
10. Santini, A.; Tenore, G.C.; Novellino, E. Nutraceuticals: A paradigm of proactive medicine. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 53-61.
11. De Jong, W.H.; Borm, P.J.A. Drug delivery and nanoparticles: Applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 133-149.
12. Jeevanandam, J.; Barhoum, A.; Chan, Y.S.; Dufresne, A.; Danquah, M.K. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: History, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein. J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 1050-1074.
13. Auffan, M.; Rose, J.; Bottero, J.Y.; Lowry, G.V.; Jolivet, J.P.; Wiesner, M.R. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 634-641.
14. Chaudhry, Q.; Scotter, M.; Blackburn, J.; Ross, B.; Boxall, A.; Castle, L.; Aitken, R.; Watkins, R. Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2008, 25, 241-258.
15. Ljubimova, J.Y.; Holler, E. Biocompatible nanopolymers: The next generation of breast cancer treatment? Nanomedicine 2012, 7, 1467-1470.
16. Peters, R.J.B.; Bouwmeester, H.; Gottardo, S.; Amenta, V.; Arena, M.; Brandho, P.; Marvin, H.J.P.; Mech, A.; Moniz, F.B.; Pesudo, L.Q.; et al. Nanomaterials for products and application in agriculture, feed and food. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 54, 155-164.
17. Dudefoi, W.; Villares, A.; Peyron, S.; Moreau, C.; Ropers, M.-H.; Gontard, N.; Cathala, B. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies for biobased materials, packaging and food applications: New opportunities and concerns. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 46, 107-121.
18. He, X.; Deng, H.; Hwang, H.-M. The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 1-21.
19. Das, G.; Patra, J.K.; Paramithiotis, S.; Shin, H.S. The sustainability challenge of food and environmental nanotechnology: Current status and imminent perceptions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4848.
20. Farokhzad, O.C.; Langer, R. Nanomedicine: Developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 1456-1459.
21. Davis, M.E.; Chen, Z.G.; Shin, D.M. Nanoparticle therapeutics: An emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 771-782.
22. Norouzi, M.; Amerian, M.; Amerian, M.; Atyabi, F. Clinical applications of nanomedicine in cancer therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2019.
23. Teleanu, D.M.; Chircov, C.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Teleanu, R.I. Neuronanomedicine: An Up-to-Date Overview. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 101.
24. Sánchez-López, E.; Guerra, M.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Lopez-Machado, A.; Ettcheto, M.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Camins, A.; Garcia, M.L.; Souto, E.B. Current Applications of Nanoemulsions in Cancer Therapeutics. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 821.
25. Andreani, T.; Severino, P.; de Hollanda, L.M.; Vazzana, M.; Souto, S.B.; Santini, A.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B. Cancer therapies: Applications, nanomedicines and nanotoxicology. In Nanostructures for Cancer Therapy; Ficai, A., Grumezescu, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Chapter 9; pp. 241-260.
26. Do Ceu Texeira, M.; Santini, A.; Souto, E.B. Nanocancer therapies: Drug delivery formulation and nanotoxicology. In Nanostructures for Antimicrobial Therapy-Micro and Nano Technologies; Multi-Volume SET I-V: Nanostructures in Therapeutic Medicine Series; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Chapter 8; pp. 203-222.
27. Petros, R.A.; DeSimone, J.M. Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 615-627.
28. Doktorovova, S.; Kovacevic, A.B.; Garcia, M.L.; Souto, E.B. Preclinical safety of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: Current evidence from in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 108, 235-252.
29. Souto, E.B.; Muller, R.H. Lipid nanoparticles: Effect on bioavailability and pharmacokinetic changes. In Drug Delivery; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010.
30. Martins, S.; Silva, A.C.; Ferreira, D.C.; Souto, E.B. Improving oral absorption of Salmon calcitonin by trimyristin lipid nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2009, 5, 76-83.
31. Muller, R.H.; Runge, S.; Ravelli, V.; Mehnert, W.; Thunemann, A.F.; Souto, E.B. Oral bioavailability of cyclosporine: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) versus drug nanocrystals. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 317, 82-89.
32. Severino, P.; Pinho, S.C.; Souto, E.B.; Santana, M.H. Polymorphism, crystallinity and hydrophilic-lipophilic balance of stearic acid and stearic acid-capric/caprylic triglyceride matrices for production of stable nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 86, 125-130.
33. Andreani, T.; Fangueiro, J.F.; Severino, P.; Souza, A.L.R.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Fernandes, P.M.V.; Calpena, A.C.; Gremiao, M.P.; Souto, E.B.; Silva, A.M. The Influence of Polysaccharide Coating on the Physicochemical Parameters and Cytotoxicity of Silica Nanoparticles for Hydrophilic Biomolecules Delivery. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1081.
34. Ferreira da Silva, C.; Severino, P.; Martins, F.; Santana, M.H.; Souto, E.B. Didanosine-loaded chitosan microspheres optimized by surface-response methodology: A modified "Maximum Likelihood Classification" approach formulation for reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2015, 70, 46-52.
35. Severino, P.; Da Silva, C.F.; Dalla Costa, T.C.; Silva, H.; Chaud, M.V.; Santana, M.H.; Souto, E.B. In vivo absorption of didanosine formulated in pellets composed of chitosan microspheres. In Vivo 2014, 28, 1045-1050.
36. Severino, P.; de Oliveira, G.G.G.; Ferraz, H.G.; Souto, E.B.; Santana, M.H.A. Preparation of gastro-resistant pellets containing chitosan microspheres for improvement of oral didanosine bioavailability. J. Pharm. Anal. 2012, 2, 188-192.
37. Severino, P.; Souto, E.B.; Pinho, S.C.; Santana, M.H. Hydrophilic coating of mitotane-loaded lipid nanoparticles: Preliminary studies for mucosal adhesion. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2013, 18, 577-581.
38. Severino, P.; Chaud, M.V.; Shimojo, A.; Antonini, D.; Lancelloti, M.; Santana, M.H.; Souto, E.B. Sodium alginate-cross-linked polymyxin B sulphate-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: Antibiotic resistance tests and HaCat and NIH/3T3 cell viability studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 129, 191-197.
39. Severino, P.; da Silva, C.F.; Andrade, L.N.; de Lima Oliveira, D.; Campos, J.; Souto, E.B. Alginate Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Targeting. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 1312-1334.
40. Sarei, F.; Mohammadpour Dounighi, N.; Zolfagharian, H.; Khaki, P.; Moradi Bidhendi, S. Alginate Nanoparticles as a Promising Adjuvant and Vaccine Delivery System. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 75, 442-449.
41. Havel, H.A. Where are the nanodrugs? An industry perspective on development of drug products containing nanomaterials. AAPS J. 2016, 18, 1351-1353.
42. Feng, J.; Markwalter, C.E.; Tian, C.; Armstrong, M.; Prud'homme, R.K. Translational formulation of nanoparticle therapeutics from laboratory discovery to clinical scale. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 200.
43. Öztürk-Atar, K.; Eroğlu, H.; Gürsoy, R.N.; Çaliş, S. Current advances in nanopharmaceuticals. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 3686-3705.
44. Souto, E.B.; Silva, G.F.; Dias-Ferreira, J.; Zielinska, A.; Ventura, F.; Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Nanopharmaceutics: Part I-Clinical Trials Legislation and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) of Nanotherapeutics in the EU. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 146.
45. Agarwal, V.; Bajpai, M.; Sharma, A. Patented and Approval Scenario of Nanopharmaceuticals with Relevancy to Biomedical Application, Manufacturing Procedure and Safety Aspects. Recent. Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2018, 12, 40-52.
46. Wu, L.P.; Wang, D.; Li, Z. Grand challenges in nanomedicine. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 106, 110302.
47. Daliu, P.; Santini, A.; Novellino, E. From pharmaceuticals to nutraceuticals: Bridging disease prevention and management. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 12, 1-7.
48. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M.; Souto, E.B.; Cicala, C.; Caiazzo, E.; Izzo, A.A.; Novellino, E.; Santini, A. Polyphenols: A concise overview on the chemistry, occurrence and human health. Phyt. Res. 2019, 33, 2221-2243.
49. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. Extractable and Non-extractable antioxidants. Molecules 2019, 24, 1933.
50. Durazzo, A.; Lucarini, M. Editorial: The State of Science and Innovation of Bioactive Research and Applications, Health, and Diseases. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 178.
51. Watkins, R.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Davis, R.M.; Xu, B. Natural product-based nanomedicine: Recent advances and issues. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 6055-6074.
52. Pimentel-Moral, S.; Teixeira, M.C.; Fernandes, A.R.; Arráez-Román, D.; Martínez-Férez, A.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Souto, E.B. Lipid nanocarriers for the loading of polyphenols-A comprehensive review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 260, 85-94.
53. Singh, B. Nanonutraceuticals, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; 326p.
54. Menditto, E.; Guerriero, F.; Orlando, V.; Crola, C.; Di Somma, C.; Illario, M.; Morisky, D.; Colao, A. Self-Assessment of Adherence to Medication: A Case Study in Campania Region Community-Dwelling Population. J Aging Res. 2015, 2015, 682503.
55. Putignano, D.; Bruzzese, D.; Orlando, V.; Fiorentino, D.; Tettamanti, A.; Menditto, E. Differences in drug use between men and women: An Italian cross sectional study. BMC Women's Health 2017, 17, 73.
56. Menditto, E.; Cahir, C.; Aza-Pascual-Salcedo, M.; Bruzzese, D.; Poblador-Plou, B.; Malo, S.; Costa, E.; González-Rubio, F.; Gimeno-Miguel, A.; Orlando, V.; et al. Adherence to chronic medication in older populations: Application of a common protocol among three European cohorts. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2018, 12, 1975-1987.
57. Iolascon, G.; Gimigliano, F.; Moretti, A.; Riccio, I.; Di Gennaro, M.; Illario, M.; Monetti, V.M.; Orlando, V.; Menditto, E. Rates and reasons for lack of persistence with anti-osteoporotic drugs: Analysis of the Campania region database. Clin. Cases Miner. Bone Metab. 2016, 13, 126-129.
58. Scala, D.; Menditto, E.; Armellino, M.F.; Manguso, F.; Monetti, V.M.; Orlando, V.; Antonino, A.; Makoul, G.; De Palma, M. Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the communication assessment tool in an outpatient surgical clinic. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2016, 16, 163.
59. Wiwanitkit, V. Delivery of nutraceuticals using nanotechnology. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 218.
60. Bernela, M.; Kaur, P.; Ahuja, M.; Thakur, R. Nano-based Delivery System for Nutraceuticals: The Potential Future. In Advances in Animal Biotechnology and Its Applications; Gahlawat, S., Duhan, J., Salar, R., Siwach, P., Kumar, S., Kaur, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018.
61. Aditya, N.P.; Espinosa, Y.G.; Norton, I.T. Encapsulation systems for the delivery of hydrophilic nutraceuticals: Food application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017, 35, 450-457.
62. Thammarutwasik, P.; Hongpattarakere, T.; Chantachum, S.; Kijroongrojana, K.; Itharat, A.; Reanmongkol, W.; Tewtrakul, S.; Ooraikul, B. Prebiotics-A Review. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 31, 401-408.
63. Patel, S.; Goyal, A. The current trends and future perspectives of prebiotics research: A review. Biotech 2012, 2, 115-125.
64. Al-Sheraji, S.H.; Ismail, A.; Manap, M.Y.; Mustafa, S.; Yusof, R.M.; Hassan, F.A. Prebiotics as functional foods: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1542-1553.
65. Bindels, L.B.; Delzenne, N.M.; Cani, P.D.; Walter, J. Towards a more comprehensive concept for prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 303-310.
66. Hutkins, R.W.; Krumbeck, J.A.; Bindels, L.B.; Cani, P.D.; Fahey, G., Jr.; Goh, Y.J.; Hamaker, B.; Martens, E.C.; Mills, D.A.; Rastal, R.A.; et al. Prebiotics: Why definitions matter. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 1-7.
67. Monteagudo-Mera, A.; Rastall, R.A.; Gibson, G.R.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Chatzifragkou, A. Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6463-6472.
68. Pandey, K.R.; Naik, S.R.; Vakil, B.V. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics-A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 7577-7587.
69. Khangwal, I.; Shukla, P. Potential prebiotics and their transmission mechanisms: Recent approaches. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 649-656.
70. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, J.S.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods 2019, 8, 92.
71. FAO. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food; FAO: London, ON, Canada, 2002.
72. Food and Agriculture Organization. FAO Technical Meeting on Prebiotics: Food Quality and Standards Service (AGNS); FAO Technical Meeting Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2007.
73. Chung, W.S.F.; Walker, A.W.; Louis, P.; Parkhill, J.; Vermeiren, J.; Bosscher, D.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J. Modulation of the human gut microbiota by dietary fibres occurs at the species level. BMC Biol. 2016, 14, 3.
74. Scavuzzi, B.M.; Henrique, F.C.; Miglioranza, L.H.S.; Simão, A.N.C.; Dichi, I. Impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on components of the metabolic syndrome. Ann. Nutr. Disord. Ther. 2014, 1, 1009.
75. Ustundag, G.H.; Altuntas, H.; Soysal, Y.D.; Kokturk, F. The effects of synbiotic Bifidobacterium lactis B94 plus Inulin addition on standard triple therapy of Helicobacter pylori eradication in children. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2017, 8130596.
76. Roškar, I.; Švigelj, K.; Štempelj, M.; Volfand, J.; Štabuc, B.; Malovrh, Š.; Rogelj, I. Effects of a probiotic product containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. animalis IM386 and Lactobacillus plantarum MP2026 in lactose intolerant individuals: Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 35, 1-8.
77. Brahe, L.K.; Le Chatelier, E.; Prifti, E.; Pons, N.; Kennedy, S.; Blædel, T.; Håkansson, J.; Dalsgaard, T.K.; Hansen, T.; Pedersen, O. Dietary modulation of the gut microbiota-A randomised controlled trial in obese postmenopausal women. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 406-417.
78. Ivey, K.L.; Hodgson, J.M.; Kerr, D.A.; Thompson, P.L.; Stojceski, B.; Prince, R.L. The effect of yoghurt and its probiotics on blood pressure and serum lipid profile; a randomised controlled trial. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 46-51.
79. Hariri, M.; Salehi, R.; Feizi, A.; Mirlohi, M.; Ghiasvand, R.; Habibi, N. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial on probiotic soy milk and soy milk: Effects on epigenetics and oxidative stress in patients with type II diabetes. Genes Nutr. 2015, 10, 52.
80. Tonucci, L.B.; Olbrich Dos Santos, K.M.; Licursi de Oliveira, L.; Rocha Ribeiro, S.M.; Duarte Martino, H.S. Clinical application of probiotics in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Arandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 36, 85-92.
81. Mohamadshahi, M.; Veissi, M.; Haidari, F.; Javid, A.Z.; Mohammadi, F.; Shirbeigi, E. Effects of probiotic yogurt consumption on lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 531-536.
82. Champagne, C.P.; Ross, R.P.; Saarela, M.; Hansen, K.F.; Charalampopoulos, D. Recommendations for the viability assessment of probiotics as concentrated cultures and in food matrices. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 149, 185-193.
83. Homayoni Rad, A.; Mehrabany, E.V.; Alipoor, B.; Mehrabany, L.V.; Javadi, M. Do probiotics act more efficiently in foods than in supplements? Nutrition 2012, 28, 733-736.
84. Markowiak, P.; Slizewska, K. Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics on Human Health. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1021.
85. Sarkar, A.; Mandal, S. Bifidobacteria-Insight into clinical outcomes and mechanisms of its probiotic action. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 159-171.
86. Turroni, F.; Duranti, S.; Milani, C.; Lugli, A.G.; van Sinderen, D.; Ventura, M. Bifidobacterium bifidum: A Key Member of the Early Human Gut Microbiota. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 544.
87. Plaza-Diaz, J.; Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Gil, A. Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S49-S66.
88. Lee, C.W.; Chen, H.J.; Chien, Y.H.; Hsia, S.M.; Chen, J.H.; Shih, C.K. Synbiotic Combination of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) and Lactobacillus acidophilus Inhibits Colon Carcinogenesis in Rats. Nutrients 2019, 12, 103.
89. Navaei, M.; Haghighat, S.; Janani, L.; Vafa, S.; Saneei Totmaj, A.; Raji Lahiji, M.; Emamat, H.; Salehi, Z.; Amirinejad, A.; Izad, M.; et al. The Effects of Synbiotic Supplementation on Antioxidant Capacity and Arm Volumes in Survivors of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Nutr. Cancer 2020, 72, 62-73.
90. Le, B.; Ngoc, A.P.T.; Yang, S.H. Synbiotic fermented soymilk with Weissella cibaria FB069 and xylooligosaccharides prevents proliferation in human colon cancer cells. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019.
91. Faraki, A.; Noori, N.; Gandomi, H.; Banuree, S.A.H.; Rahmani, F. Effect of Auricularia auricula aqueous extract on survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium bifidum Bb-12 and on sensorial and functional properties of synbiotic yogurt. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1254-1263.
92. Athiyyah, A.; Widjaja, N.; Fitri, P.; Setiowati, A.; Darma, A.; Ranuh, R.; Sudarmo, S. Effects of a multispecies synbiotic on intestinal mucosa immune responses. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2019, 11.
93. Morshedi, M.; Saghafi-Asl, M.; Hosseinifard, E.-S. The potential therapeutic effects of the gut microbiome manipulation by synbiotic containing-Lactobacillus plantarum on neuropsychological performance of diabetic rats. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 1-14.
94. Ghafouri, A.; Zarrati, M.; Shidfar, F.; Heydari, I.; Shokouhi Shoormasti, R.; Eslami, O. Effect of synbiotic bread containing lactic acid on glycemic indicators, biomarkers of antioxidant status and inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2019, 11, 103.
95. Moser, A.M.; Spindelboeck, W.; Halwachs, B.; Strohmaier, H.; Kump, P.; Gorkiewicz, G.; Hogenauer, C. Effects of an oral synbiotic on the gastrointestinal immune system and microbiota in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 2767-2778.
96. Pistol, G.C.; Marin, D.E.; Dragomir, C.; Taranu, I. Synbiotic combination of prebiotic grape pomace extract and probiotic Lactobacillus sp. reduced important intestinal inflammatory markers and in-depth signalling mediators in lipopolysaccharide-treated Caco-2 cells. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 121, 291-305.
97. Sengupta, S.; Koley, H.; Dutta, S.; Bhowal, J. Hepatoprotective effects of synbiotic soy yogurt on mice fed a high-cholesterol diet. Nutrition 2019, 63, 36-44.
98. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506-514.
99. Brandi, J.; Di Carlo, C.; Manfredi, M.; Federici, F.; Bazaj, A.; Rizzi, E.; Cornaglia, G.; Manna, L.; Marengo, E.; Cecconi, D. Investigating the Proteomic Profile of HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells after Lactobacillus kefiri SGL 13 Exposure Using the SWATH Method. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 1690-1699.
100. Ragul, K.; Kandasamy, S.; Devi, P.B.; Shetty, P.H. Evaluation of functional properties of potential probiotic isolates from fermented brine pickle. Food Chem. 2020, 311, 126057.
101. Ayyash, M.; Abu-Jdayil, B.; Itsaranuwat, P.; Galiwango, E.; Tamiello-Rosa, C.; Abdullah, H.; Esposito, G.; Hunashal, Y.; Obaid, R.S.; Hamed, F. Characterization, bioactivities, and rheological properties of exopolysaccharide produced by novel probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum C70 isolated from camel milk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 144, 938-946.
102. Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Yari Khosroushahi, A.; Movassaghpour, A.A.; Talebi, M.; Pourghassem Gargari, B. Modulatory role of exopolysaccharides of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii as probiotic yeasts from dairy products in human colon cancer cells. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103675.
103. Justino, P.F.C.; Franco, A.X.; Pontier-Bres, R.; Monteiro, C.E.S.; Barbosa, A.L.R.; Souza, M.H.L.P.; Czerucka, D.; Soares, P.M.G. Modulation of 5-fluorouracil activation of toll-like/MyD88/NF-κB/MAPK pathway by Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 probiotic. Cytokine 2020, 125, 154791.
104. Ghanavati, R.; Asadollahi, P.; Shapourabadi, M.B.; Razavi, S.; Talebi, M.; Rohani, M. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacilli cocktail on HT-29 colon carcinoma cells growth and modulation of the Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 139, 103829.
105. Rupasinghe, H.P.V.; Parmar, I.; Neir, S.V. Biotransformation of Cranberry Proanthocyanidins to Probiotic Metabolites by Lactobacillus rhamnosus Enhances Their Anticancer Activity in HepG2 Cells in Vitro. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 4750795.
106. Nozari, S.; Faridvand, Y.; Etesami, A.; Ahmad Khan Beiki, M.; Miresmaeili Mazrakhondi, S.A.; Abdolalizadeh, J. Potential anticancer effects of cell wall protein fractions from Lactobacillus paracasei on human intestinal Caco-2 cell line. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 148-154.
107. Chandel, D.; Sharma, M.; Chawla, V.; Sachdeva, N.; Shukla, G. Isolation, characterization and identification of antigenotoxic and anticancerous indigenous probiotics and their prophylactic potential in experimental colon carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14769.
108. Lin, P.-Y.; Li, S.-C.; Lin, H.-P.; Shih, C.-K. Germinated brown rice combined with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis inhibits colorectal carcinogenesis in rats. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 216-224.
109. Karimi Ardestani, S.; Tafvizi, F.; Tajabadi Ebrahimi, M. Heat-killed probiotic bacteria induce apoptosis of HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cell line via the regulation of Bax/Bcl2 and caspases pathway. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2019, 38, 1069-1081.
110. He, L.; Yang, H.; Tang, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lu, B.; He, H.; Tang, S.; Sun, Y.; Liu, F.; et al. Intestinal probiotics E. coli Nissle 1917 as a targeted vehicle for delivery of p53 and Tum-5 to solid tumors for cancer therapy. J. Biol. Eng. 2019, 13, 58.
111. Shi, L.; Sheng, J.; Wang, M.; Luo, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Z.; Yang, X. Combination Therapy of TGF-beta Blockade and Commensal-derived Probiotics Provides Enhanced Antitumor Immune Response and Tumor Suppression. Theranostics 2019, 9, 4115-4129.
112. Chen, J.C.; Tsai, C.-C.; Hsieh, C.C.; Lan, A.; Huang, C.C.; Leu, S.F. Multispecies probiotics combination prevents ovalbumin-induced airway hyperreactivity in mice. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2018, 46, 354-360.
113. Nakamura, S.; Mitsunaga, F. Anti-Allergic Effect of Para-Probiotics from Non-Viable Acetic Acid Bacteria in Ovalbumin-Sensitized Mice. Food Nutr. Sci. 2018, 9, 1376-1385.
114. Koh, W.Y.; Utra, U.; Ahmad, R.; Rather, I.A.; Park, Y.-H. Evaluation of probiotic potential and anti-hyperglycemic properties of a novel Lactobacillus strain isolated from water kefir grains. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 1369-1376.
115. Yadav, R.; Dey, D.K.; Vij, R.; Meena, S.; Kapila, R.; Kapila, S. Evaluation of anti-diabetic attributes of Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5957, Lactobacillus rhamnosus MTCC: 5897 and Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC: 5898 in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 125, 454-462.
116. Miraghajani, M.; Zaghian, N.; dehkohneh, A.; Mirlohi, M.; Ghiasvand, R. Probiotic Soy Milk Consumption and Renal Function among Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 124-132.
117. Choi, W.J.; Dong, H.J.; Jeong, H.U.; Jung, H.H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, T.H. Antiobesity Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum LMT1-48 Accompanied by Inhibition of Enterobacter cloacae in the Intestine of Diet-Induced Obese Mice. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 560-566.
118. Legrand, R.; Lucas, N.; Dominique, M.; Azhar, S.; Deroissart, C.; Le Solliec, M.-A.; Rondeaux, J.; Nobis, S.; Guérin, C.; Léon, F.; et al. Commensal Hafnia alvei strain reduces food intake and fat mass in obese mice-a new potential probiotic for appetite and body weight management. Int. J. Obes. 2020.
119. Kang, D.; Su, M.; Duan, Y.; Huang, Y. Eurotium cristatum, a potential probiotic fungus from Fuzhuan brick tea, alleviated obesity in mice by modulating gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5032-5045.
120. Huang, C.H.; Ho, C.Y.; Chen, C.T.; Hsu, H.F.; Lin, Y.H. Probiotic BSH Activity and Anti-Obesity Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum Strain TCI378 Isolated from Korean Kimchi. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 24, 434-441.
121. Hsu, T.C.; Yi, P.J.; Lee, T.Y.; Liu, J.R. Probiotic characteristics and zearalenone-removal ability of a Bacillus licheniformis strain. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194866.
122. Wang, J.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Ji, H. Swine-Derived Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Inhibits Growth and Adhesion of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Mediates Host Defense. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1364.
123. Rocha-Ramírez, M.L.; Hernández-Ochoa, B.; Gómez-Manzo, S.; Marcial-Quino, J.; Cárdenas-Rodríguez, N.; Centeno-Leija, S.; García-Garibay, M. Evaluation of Immunomodulatory Activities of the Heat-Killed Probiotic Strain Lactobacillus casei IMAU60214 on Macrophages in Vitro. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 79.
124. Beller, A.; Kruglov, A.; Durek, P.; von Goetze, V.; Hoffmann, U.; Maier, R.; Heiking, K.; Siegmund, B.; Heinz, G.; Mashreghi, M.F.; et al. P104 Anaeroplasma, a potential anti-inflammatory probiotic for the treatment of chronic intestinal inflammation. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, A45-A46.
125. Coqueiro, A.Y.; Raizel, R.; Bonvini, A.; Tirapegui, J.; Rogero, M.M. Probiotics for inflammatory bowel diseases: A promising adjuvant treatment. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 70, 20-29.
126. Machado Prado, M.R.; Boller, C. Anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics. In Discovery and Development of Anti-Inflammatory Agents from Natural Products; Brahmachari, G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Chapter 9; pp. 259-282.
127. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Hong, G.; Huang, C.; Qian, W.; Bai, T.; Song, J.; Song, Y.; Hou, X. Probiotic mixtures with aerobic constituent promoted the recovery of multi-barriers in DSS-induced chronic colitis. Life Sci. 2020, 240, 117089.
128. Zhang, Z.; Lv, J.; Pan, L.; Zhang, Y. Roles and applications of probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8135-8143.
129. Lee, J.-E.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, N.; Lee, S.H.; Park, S.B.; Koh, B.; Kang, D.; Kim, S.; Yoo, H.M. Characterization of the Anti-Cancer Activity of the Probiotic Bacterium Lactobacillus fermentum Using 2D vs. 3D Culture in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 557.
130. Fornai, M.; Pellegrini, C.; Benvenuti, L.; Tirotta, E.; Gentile, D.; Natale, G.; Ryskalin, L.; Colucci, R.; Piccoli, E.; Ghelardi, E.; et al. Protective effects of the combination Bifidobacterium longum plus lactoferrin against NSAID-induced enteropathy. Nutrition 2020, 70, 110583.
131. Ben Othman, M.; Sakamoto, K. Effect of inactivated Bifidobacterium longum intake on obese diabetes model mice (TSOD). Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108792.
132. Talani, G.; Biggio, F.; Mostallino, M.C.; Locci, V.; Porcedda, C.; Boi, L.; Saolini, E.; Piras, R.; Sanna, E.; Biggio, G. Treatment with gut bifidobacteria improves hippocampal plasticity and cognitive behavior in adult healthy rats. Neuropharmacology 2020, 165, 107909.
133. Khangwal, I.; Shukla, P. Prospecting prebiotics, innovative evaluation methods, and their health applications: A review. Biotech 2019, 9, 187.
134. Korcz, E.; Kerényi, Z.; Varga, L. Dietary fibers, prebiotics, and exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: Potential health benefits with special regard to cholesterol-lowering effects. Food. Funct. 2018, 9, 3057-3068.
135. Shehata, M.; El-sahn, M.A.; El-Sohaimy, S.A.; Youssef, M.M. Role and Mechanisms Lowering Cholesterol by Dietary of Probiotics and Prebiotics: A Review. J. Appl. Sci. 2019, 19, 737-746.
136. Zhu, W.; Zhou, S.; Liu, J.; McLean, R.J.C.; Chu, W. Prebiotic, immuno-stimulating and gut microbiota-modulating effects of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109591.
137. Cerdó, T.; García-Santos, A.J.; G. Bermúdez, M.; Campoy, C. The Role of Probiotics and Prebiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 635.
138. Vyas, N.; Nair, S.; Rao, M.; Miraj, S.S. Chapter 29-Childhood Obesity and Diabetes: Role of Probiotics and Prebiotics. In Global Perspectives on Childhood Obesity, 2nd ed.; Bagchi, D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019.
139. Laurell, A.; Sjöberg, K. Prebiotics and synbiotics in ulcerative colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 52, 477-485.
140. Rani, A.; Baruah, R.; Goyal, A. Prebiotic Chondroitin Sulfate Disaccharide Isolated from Chicken Keel Bone Exhibiting Anticancer Potential against Human Colon Cancer Cells. Nutr. Cancer 2019, 71, 825-839.
141. Wen, Y.; Wen, P.; Hu, T.G.; Linhardt, R.J.; Zong, M.H.; Wu, H.; Chen, Z.Y. Encapsulation of phycocyanin by prebiotics and polysaccharides-based electrospun fibers and improved colon cancer prevention effects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 672-681.
142. Ohara, T.; Mori, T. Antiproliferative Effects of Short-chain Fatty Acids on Human Colorectal Cancer Cells via Gene Expression Inhibition. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 4659-4666.
143. Zhou, L.; Xie, M.; Yang, F.; Liu, J. Antioxidant activity of high purity blueberry anthocyanins and the effects on human intestinal microbiota. LWT 2020, 117, 108621.
144. Li, E.; Yang, S.; Zou, Y.; Cheng, W.; Li, B.; Hu, T.; Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Liao, S.; Pang, D. Purification, Characterization, Prebiotic Preparations and Antioxidant Activity of Oligosaccharides from Mulberries. Molecules 2019, 24, 2329.
145. Weinborn, V.; Valenzuela, C.; Olivares, M.; Arredondo, M.; Weill, R.; Pizarro, F. Prebiotics increase heme iron bioavailability and do not affect non-heme iron bioavailability in humans. Food. Funct. 2017, 8, 1994-1999.
146. Aliasgharzadeh, A.; Khalili, M.; Mirtaheri, E.; Pourghassem Gargari, B.; Tavakoli, F.; Abbasalizad Farhangi, M.; Babaei, H.; Dehghan, P. A Combination of Prebiotic Inulin and Oligofructose Improve Some of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 5, 507-514.
147. Da Silva Sabo, S.; Converti, A.; Todorov, S.D.; Domínguez, J.M.; de Souza Oliveira, R.P. Effect of inulin on growth and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum in stationary and shaken cultures. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 864-870.
148. Ramos, C.I.; Armani, R.G.; Canziani, M.E.F.; Dalboni, M.A.; Dolenga, C.J.R.; Nakao, L.S.; Campbell, K.L.; Cuppari, L. Effect of prebiotic (fructooligosaccharide) on uremic toxins of chronic kidney disease patients: A randomized controlled trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2018, 34, 1876-1884.
149. Flesch, A.G.; Poziomyck, A.K.; Damin, D.C. The therapeutic use of symbiotics. Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig. 2014, 27, 206-209.
150. Bonfrate, L.; Palo, D.M.; Celano, G.; Albert, A.; Vitellio, P.; De Angelis, M.; Gobbetti, M.; Portincasa, P. Effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in IBS patients. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 50, e13201.
151. Mohan, A.; Hadi, J.; Gutierrez-Maddox, N.; Li, Y.; Leung, I.K.H.; Gao, Y.; Shu, Q.; Quek, S.Y. Sensory, Microbiological and Physicochemical Characterisation of Functional Manuka Honey Yogurts Containing Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DPC16. Foods 2020, 9, 106.
152. Li, P.H.; Lu, W.C.; Chan, Y.J.; Zhao, Y.P.; Nie, X.B.; Jiang, C.X.; Ji, Y.X. Feasibility of Using Seaweed (Gracilaria coronopifolia) Synbiotic as a Bioactive Material for Intestinal Health. Foods 2019, 8, 623.
153. Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Al-Dalali, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; ud Din, J.; Chen, C.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z. Physicochemical and Microbiological Properties of Synbiotic Yogurt Made with Probiotic Yeast Saccharomyces boulardii in Combination with Inulin. Foods 2019, 8, 468.
154. Karimi, M.; Yazdi, F.T.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Shahabi-Ghahfarrokhi, I.; Chamani, J. Development of active antimicrobial poly (l-glutamic) acid-poly (l-lysine) packaging material to protect probiotic bacterium. Polym. Test. 2020, 83, 106338.
155. Aziz Mousavi, S.M.A.; Mirhosseini, S.A.; Rastegar Shariat Panahi, M.; Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini, H. Characterization of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and its in Vitro Assessment against Colorectal Cancer Cells. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019.
156. Kouhkan, M.; Ahangar, P.; Babaganjeh, L.; Allahyari-Devin, M. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei and its anticancer and antibacterial activities. Curr. Nanosci. 2019, 15.
157. Xu, C.; Qiao, L.; Guo, Y.; Ma, L.; Cheng, Y. Preparation, characteristics and antioxidant activity of polysaccharides and proteins-capped selenium nanoparticles synthesized by Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 576-585.
158. Xu, C.; Guo, Y.; Qiao, L.; Ma, L.; Cheng, Y.; Roman, A. Biogenic Synthesis of Novel Functionalized Selenium Nanoparticles by Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 and Its Protective Effects on Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Caused by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1129.
159. Lee, H.A.; Kim, H.; Lee, K.W.; Park, K.Y. Dead Nano-Sized Lactobacillus plantarum Inhibits Azoxymethane/Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colon Cancer in Balb/c Mice. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 1400-1405.
160. Markus, J.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Kim, Y.J.; Abbai, R.; Singh, P.; Ahn, S.; Perez, Z.E.J.; Hurh, J.; Yang, D.C. Intracellular synthesis of gold nanoparticles with antioxidant activity by probiotic Lactobacillus kimchicus DCY51(T) isolated from Korean kimchi. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 95, 85-93.
161. Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Perez-Morales, R.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Mueller, M.; Praznik, W.; Loeppert, R.; Bermudez-Morales, V.; Zavala-Padilla, G.; Ayala, M.; Olvera, C. Self-assembled high molecular weight inulin nanoparticles: Enzymatic synthesis, physicochemical and biological properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 215, 160-169.
162. Kim, W.; Han, G.; Hong, L.; Kang, S.-K.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Choi, Y.-J.; Cho, C. Novel production of natural bacteriocin via internalization of dextran nanoparticles into probiotics. Biomaterials 2019, 218, 119360.
163. Cui, L.H.; Yan, C.G.; Li, H.S.; Kim, W.S.; Hong, L.; Kang, S.K.; Choi, Y.J.; Cho, C.S. A New Method of Producing a Natural Antibacterial Peptide by Encapsulated Probiotics Internalized with Inulin Nanoparticles as Prebiotics. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 28, 510-519.
164. Hong, L.; Kim, W.S.; Lee, S.M.; Kang, S.K.; Choi, Y.J.; Cho, C.S. Pullulan Nanoparticles as Prebiotics Enhance the Antibacterial Properties of Lactobacillus plantarum through the Induction of Mild Stress in Probiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 142.
165. Kaur, K.; Rath, G. Formulation and evaluation of UV protective synbiotic skin care topical formulation. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Laser Dermatol. 2019, 21, 332-342.
166. Krithika, B.; Preetha, R. Formulation of protein based inulin incorporated synbiotic nanoemulsion for enhanced stability of probiotic. Mat. Res. Express 2019, 6, 114003.
167. Atia, A.; Gomaa, A.; Fliss, I.; Beyssac, E.; Garrait, G.; Subirade, M. A prebiotic matrix for encapsulation of probiotics: Physicochemical and microbiological study. J. Microencapsul. 2016, 33, 89-101.
168. Caneus, D. Nanotechnology and its Partnership with Synbiotics. J. Nanomed. Res. 2017, 6, 142.
169. Pathak, K.; Akhtar, N. Nanoprobiotics: Progress and Issues. In Nanonutraceuticals, 1st ed.; Singh., B., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; Chapter 9; 326p.
170. Rajendran, K.; Sen, S.; Latha, P. Nanotechnology in probiotics and prebiotics. In Nanotechnology in Nutraceuticals: Production to Consumption, 1st ed.; Sen, S., Pathak, Y., Eds.; CRC Press: Oxfordshire, UK; Taylor & Francis Group: Oxfordshire, UK; Abingdon-on-Thames: Oxfordshire, UK, 2016; Chapter 9.
171. Kazmierczak, R.; Choe, E.; Sinclair, J.; Eisenstark, A. Direct attachment of nanoparticle cargo to Salmonella typhimurium membranes designed for combination bacteriotherapy against tumors. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1225, 151-163.
172. Hu, Q.; Wu, M.; Fang, C.; Cheng, C.; Zhao, M.; Fang, W.; Chu, P.K.; Ping, Y.; Tang, G. Engineering Nanoparticle-Coated Bacteria as Oral DNA Vaccines for Cancer Immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2732-2739.
173. Feher, F.; Pinter, E.; Helyes, Z.; Szolcsanyi, J. Nano-size particles of probiotics for preventing and treating neuroinflammation. ARVO Annual Meeting. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 331.
174. Kim, W.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Singh, B.; Maharjan, S.; Hong, L.; Lee, S.M.; Cui, L.H.; Lee, K.J.; Kim, G.; Yun, C.H.; et al. A new way of producing pediocin in Pediococcus acidilactici through intracellular stimulation by internalized inulin nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5878.
175. Song, Q.; Zheng, C.; Jia, J.; Zhao, H.; Feng, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y. A Probiotic Spore-Based Oral Autonomous Nanoparticles Generator for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1903793.
176. Fung, W.Y.; Yuen, K.H.; Liong, M.T. Agrowaste-based nanofibers as a probiotic encapsulant: Fabrication and characterization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8140-8147.
177. Nagy, Z.K.; Wagner, I.; Suhajda, A.; Tobak, T.; Harsztos, A.H.; Vigh, T.; Soti, P.L.; Pataki, K.; Molnar, K.; Marosi, G. Nanofibrous solid dosage form of living bacteria prepared by electrospinning. Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 352-361.
178. Zupancic, S.; Škrlec, K.; Kocbek, P.; Kristl, J.; Berlec, A. Effects of electrospinning on the viability of ten species of lactic acid bacteria in poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 483.
179. Wang, A.; Xu, C.; Zhang, C.; Gan, Y.; Wang, B. Experimental Investigation of the Properties of Electrospun Nanofibers for Potential Medical Application. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 418932.
180. Xue, J.; Xie, J.; Liu, W.; Xia, Y. Electrospun Nanofibers: New Concepts, Materials, and Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1976-1987.
181. Shahriar, S.M.; Mondal, J.; Hasan, M.N.; Revuri, V.; Lee, D.Y.; Lee, Y.K. Electrospinning Nanofibers for Therapeutics Delivery. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 532.
182. Torres-Martínez, E.T.; Cornejo Bravo, J.M.; Serrano Medina, A.; Pérez González, G.L.; Villarreal Gómez, L.J. A summary of electrospun nanofibers as drug delivery system: Drugs loaded and biopolymers used as matrices. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2018, 15, 1360-1374.
183. Ghorani, B.; Tucker, N. Fundamentals of electrospinning as novel delivery for bioactive compounds in food nanotechnology. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 51, 227-240.
184. Franz, B.; Balkundi, S.S.; Dahl, C.; Lvov, Y.M.; Prange, A. Layer-by-layer nano-encapsulation of microbes: Controlled cell surface modification and investigation of substrate uptake in bacteria. Macromol. Biosci. 2010, 11, 164-172.
185. Ebrahimnejad, P.; Khavarpour, M.; Khalilid, S. Survival of Lactobacillus Acidophilus as probiotic bacteria using chitosan nanoparticles. IJE Trans. A Basics 2017, 30, 456-463.
186. Ranjan, S.; Dasgupta, N.; Chakraborty, A.R.; Melvin Samuel, S.; Ramalingam, C.; Shanker, R.; Kumar, A. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies in food industries: Opportunities and research trends. J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16, 2464.
187. Salmerón, I. Fermented cereal beverages: From probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic towards Nanoscience designed healthy drinks. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 114-124.
188. Rezaee, P.; Kasra Kermanshahi, R.; Katouli, M. Prebiotics decrease the antibacterial effect of nano silver and nano TiO2 particles against probiotic bacteria of food. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 10.
189. Khan, S.T.; Saleem, S.; Ahamed, M.; Ahmad, J. Survival of probiotic bacteria in the presence of food grade nanoparticles from chocolates: An in vitro and in vivo study. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6689-6700.
190. Liu, J.M.; Zhao, N.; Wang, Z.H.; Lv, S.W.; Li, C.Y.; Wang, S. In-Taken Labeling and in Vivo Tracing Foodborne Probiotics via DNA-Encapsulated Persistent Luminescence Nanoprobe Assisted Autofluorescence-Free Bioimaging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 514-519.
191. EFSA Scientific Committee. Scientific Opinion: Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2140.
192. McClements, D.J.; Xiao, H. Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles. NPJ Sci. Food 2017, 1, 6.
193. Gwinn, M.R.; Vallyathan, V. Nanoparticles: Health Effects-Pros and Cons. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1818-1825.
Alessandra Durazzo1, Amirhossein Nazhand2, Massimo Lucarini1, Atanas G. Atanasov3,4,5,6, Eliana B. Souto7,8, Ettore Novellino9, Raffaele Capasso10,* and Antonello Santini9,*
1CREA—Research Centre for Food and Nutrition; Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
2Biotechnology Department, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 9th km of Farah Abad Road, Mazandaran, 48181 68984 Sari, Iran
3Institute of Neurobiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 23 Acad. G. Bonchev str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
4Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland
5Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
6Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
7Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
8CEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
9Department of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy
10Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy
*Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
© 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Nazhand, Amirhossein; Lucarini, Massimo; Atanasov, Atanas G; Souto, Eliana B
; Novellino, Ettore; Capasso, Raffaele
; Santini, Antonello