Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify items from the Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale – RCADS-C/P that provided a brief, reliable and valid screen for anxiety and/or depressive disorders in adolescents. In addition, we examined whether adding items assessing suicidal ideation (Moods and Feelings Questionnaire – MFQ- C/P) and symptom impact and duration (items adapted from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire – SDQ) improved the identification of adolescents with anxiety and/or depressive disorders. We compared two samples of adolescents and their parents – a community sample, recruited through secondary schools in England (n = 214) and a clinic-referred sample, who met diagnostic criteria for anxiety and/or depressive disorder and were recruited through a university-based research clinic (n = 246). Participants completed the RCADS-C/P with additional symptom impact and duration items, and the MFQ-C/P. Using ROC curve analyses, we identified a set of 11 RCADS-C/P items (6 addressing anxiety and 5 depression symptoms) for adolescent- and parent-report. This set of 11 symptom items achieved sensitivity/specificity values > .75, which were comparable to corresponding values for the RCADS-47-C/P. Combining adolescent and parent-report improved the identification of anxiety/depression in adolescents compared to using adolescent-report alone. Finally, adding two symptom impact items further improved the sensitivity/specificity of the 11 symptom items, whereas adding suicidal ideation items did not. The 11 RCADS items accurately discriminated between the community and clinic-referred sample with anxiety and/or depressive disorders and have the potential to quickly and accurately identify adolescents with these disorders in community settings.

Details

Title
Using the 11-item Version of the RCADS to Identify Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Adolescents
Author
Radez Jerica 1 ; Waite, Polly 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Chorpita, Bruce 3 ; Creswell, Cathy 4 ; Orchard, Faith 5 ; Percy, Ray 6 ; Spence, Susan H 7 ; Reardon, Tessa 4 

 University of Reading, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Reading, UK (GRID:grid.9435.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0457 9566); University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, The Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.451190.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0573 576X) 
 University of Reading, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Reading, UK (GRID:grid.9435.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0457 9566); University of Oxford, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948) 
 University of California, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.19006.3e) (ISNI:0000 0000 9632 6718) 
 University of Oxford, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948) 
 University of Sussex, School of Psychology, Brighton, UK (GRID:grid.12082.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7590) 
 University of Reading, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Reading, UK (GRID:grid.9435.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0457 9566) 
 Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Australian Institute of Suicide Research and Prevention, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1022.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0437 5432) 
Pages
1241-1257
Publication year
2021
Publication date
Sep 2021
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
27307166
e-ISSN
27307174
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2556159823
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.