Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment (LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis–stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called “life themes,” which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and “semi-adaptive plans,” which are the rigid management strategies of “life themes” implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis–stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.

Details

Title
Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure
Author
Sassaroli, Sandra 1 ; Caselli, Gabriele 2 ; Mansueto, Giovanni 3 ; Palmieri, Sara 3 ; Pepe, Alessandro 4 ; Veronese, Guido 5 ; Ruggiero, Giovanni M. 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 “Studi Cognitivi” Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy; Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.512652.7); Sigmund Freud University, Wien, Austria (GRID:grid.263618.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0367 8888) 
 “Studi Cognitivi” Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.263618.8); Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.512652.7); Sigmund Freud University, Wien, Austria (GRID:grid.263618.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0367 8888); London South Bank University, Department of Psychology, London, UK (GRID:grid.4756.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 2291) 
 Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.512652.7); Sigmund Freud University, Wien, Austria (GRID:grid.263618.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0367 8888) 
 University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Human Science and Education, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.7563.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 1754) 
 University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Human Science and Education, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.7563.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 1754); Stellenbosch University, Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch, South Africa (GRID:grid.11956.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2214 904X) 
 “Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Ricerca” Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milano, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.11956.3a); “Studi Cognitivi” Cognitive Psychotherapy School and Research Center, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.11956.3a); Sigmund Freud University, Milan, Italy (GRID:grid.512652.7); Sigmund Freud University, Wien, Austria (GRID:grid.263618.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0367 8888) 
Pages
527-565
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Sep 2022
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
08949085
e-ISSN
15736563
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2703191084
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.