Introduction
Polymer microcapsules are of particular interest for applications including self‐healing coatings, catalysis, bioreactions, sensing, and drug delivery. The primary way that polymer capsules can exhibit functionality relevant to these diverse fields is through the incorporation of functional cargo in the capsule cavity or wall. Detailed loading methods exist but are mainly dependent on the properties of the cargo. For example, the solubility, charge, radius of gyration or size, and chemical composition of the cargo often determine how it can be loaded into polymer capsules. A particular challenge is the incorporation of small molecules, as water soluble drugs have a tendency to “leak” out of the capsules, due to the semipermeable nature of many polymer films. A related challenge is the incorporation of large materials (on the order of tens to hundreds of nanometers) that are thicker than most polymer capsule walls (on the order of nanometers) and are therefore difficult to incorporate or embed in the coatings. The use of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) particles for the preparation of loaded polymer capsules has been well studied, especially because CaCO3 particles can be coprecipitated with proteins, are highly biologically compatible, and can be made in unique geometries. However, coprecipitated CaCO3 particles and the resultant polymer capsules are generally polydisperse and require the addition of a stabilizing polymer (e.g., poly(styrene sulfonate), PSS) during formation to allow for monodisperse spherical CaCO3 particles (PSS–CaCO3 particles) to be prepared. In previous reports, small molecules were loaded into these particles and polymer capsules could be subsequently prepared following layer‐by‐layer (LbL) coating with multiple polymer layers. However, the capacity of PSS–CaCO3 particles to adsorb high amounts of diverse cargo ranging in size, charge, and hydrophobicity has not been explored, nor has it been reported that capping with a single polymer layer, rather than capping with a LbL film, is sufficient for capsule preparation.
Herein, we report a method for synthesizing polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 particles that are capable of adsorbing a wide variety of cargo (ranging from biomolecules to inorganic and organic materials) for the preparation of a broad range of polymer capsules in under 30 min (in most cases), from template synthesis to core removal (Scheme 1). This technique is not only accomplished in a short time but also in a limited number of steps, which should make it conducive for scale up. Six different types of polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 particles (four stabilizing polymers, one of which can be used to produce three distinct sizes) are used to load 15 different types of cargo of various charges and hydrophobicity, comprising sizes from hundreds of nanometers (large metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs)) to below one nanometer (doxorubicin (DOX)) (Table S1, Supporting Information). Polymer capsules could then be prepared after capping with a single polymer layer chosen from seven different capping polymers and removing the CaCO3 cores, leading to the formation of pH‐responsive, biodegradable, redox responsive or nonresponsive capsules.
Scheme of the capsule assembly process. Polymer‐stabilized calcium carbonate particles are loaded with diverse cargo, ranging from biomolecules to inorganic particles and then capped with a polymer such as a polypeptide or a supramolecular polymer. After capping, the calcium carbonate core can be removed, yielding highly loaded functional capsules. A detailed table of the cargo, stabilizing polymers, and capping polymers examined in this study can be found in Table S1, Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
As a first example, 4–5 μm PSS–CaCO3 particles (Figure S1, Supporting Information) were used to adsorb large MOFs, which are useful for diverse applications such as catalysis, sensing, and separations (Figure 1). These materials were loaded onto the PSS–CaCO3 particles in the form of cubes (≈2 wt%; i.e., 1 mg of PSS–CaCO3 loaded 0.02 mg of MOF cubes), wires (≈1 wt%), flakes (≈14 wt%), and cages (<1 wt%). Note that these values translate roughly to monolayer deposition. A single capping layer of poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) was then deposited to stabilize the cargo and allowed for the preparation of capsules after CaCO3 dissolution with 40 × 10−3
Microscopy images corresponding to capsules loaded with various types of cargo prepared from a–d) and f–o) PSS/PAH and e) PSS/HIS. The fluorescence microscopy images correspond to autofluorescence for e) DOX, j) iron oxide, k) nanodiamonds, and l) gold, and to fluorescent labels for f) fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)‐dextran, g) liposomes (FITC‐labeled lipid), h) ovalbumin (FITC), and i) DNA (Alexa Fluor 647‐labeled DNA and FITC‐labeled PAH). m) TEM image of PSS/PAH capsules partially loaded with Prussian Blue cubes. n) PSS/PAH capsule loaded with Prussian Blue cages (inset) with a differential interference contrast (DIC) image of the capsules. o) EDX mapping of a PSS/PAH capsule loaded with Prussian Blue cages (purple corresponds to sulfur from PSS and green corresponds to iron from Prussian Blue cages). The scale bars are a–l) 5 μm and m–o) 1 μm.
The incorporation of small molecules and biomolecules is of interest for biomedical applications and was also investigated. Plasmid DNA (Figure S6, Supporting Information), potentially useful for gene therapy or protein expression, liposomes (Figure S7, Supporting Information), useful for encapsulating sensitive cargo, protein (ovalbumin) (≈7 wt%) (Figure S8, Supporting Information), useful as a model antigen for vaccine delivery, iodine dendrimers (Figure S9, Supporting Information), useful for imaging, polydextran (Figure S10, Supporting Information), a model cargo, and DOX (Figure S11, Supporting Information), useful as an anticancer agent, were all (separately) loaded onto PSS–CaCO3 particles and resulted in stable capsules after polymer capping and template removal. The DOX‐loaded capsules (≈33 wt%) were capped with a biodegradable polypeptide, poly(
To further extend this technique, different sizes, shapes, and compositions of polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 were obtained. To prepare submicrometer‐sized (900 and 500 nm) PSS–CaCO3 particles, Ca(NO3)2 was used instead of CaCl2 and the particles were prepared in less than 20 min rather than overnight. The 900 nm PSS–CaCO3 particles were highly loaded (≈34 wt%) with a pH sensor/fluorophore (naphthofluorescein) and were capped with PAH to form stable capsules (Figure S12, Supporting Information). The 900 nm and 500 nm PSS–CaCO3 particles were loaded with DOX and it was found that they could form stable DOX–PSS particles after template removal without any capping layer (Figure S13, Supporting Information). Cell toxicity was investigated with methylthiazol tetrazolium (MTT) assays at different time points for both sizes of the uncapped DOX–PSS particles and DOX‐loaded PSS/poly(
MTT assay cell toxicity results for 500 and 900 nm DOX‐loaded particles and DOX loaded ARG‐capped capsules at different time points for a) 20 ng of DOX per well and c) 200 ng of DOX per well. U – Uncapped DOX–PSS particles (CaCO3 removed) and C – capped DOX‐loaded PSS/ARG capsules. Corresponding fluorescence microscopy images of the cells incubated for 6 h with 900 nm; b) uncapped DOX–PSS particles and d) capped DOX‐loaded PSS/ARG capsules (equivalent concentration of 20 ng DOX per well). The cell viability of untreated cells was normalized to 100%. The red corresponds to DOX, the blue corresponds to nuclear staining (Hoechst), and the green corresponds to cell membrane staining (phalloidin‐Alexa Fluor 647). The scale bars are 10 μm.
Finally, we investigated different polymers for stabilization during particle formation, and also for polymer capping and unloaded capsule formation. Stabilizing polymers, including a polypeptide, poly(
Nonloaded capsules formed with different capping polymers. The fluorescence corresponds to FITC labeling for a) PAH and b) PLL, and to Alexa Fluor 488 labeling for c) and d) PDPA. Both pH‐responsive polymers c) and d) PDPA and g) and h) HIS showed pH‐dependent shrinking (above the pKa) and swelling (below the pKa) and became more transparent when hydrated (i.e., below the pKa). The scale bars are 10 μm and the pH listed on the images corresponds to the pH of the solution when imaging.
Conclusion
Polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 particles allow for a comprehensive toolbox to be applied to the preparation of functional, cargo loaded polymer capsules. Using the different sized particles, stabilizing polymers, capping polymers and cargo demonstrated herein, over 500 unique types of loaded and unloaded capsules could potentially be prepared (Table S1, Supporting Information). It is foreseeable that other polymers or thin films, such as metal phenolic network films, could be used for the preparation of the CaCO3 particles and for the capping layer, as the examples provided herein are not exhaustive. Similarly, the cargo and therapeutics loaded in this study were chosen as representative classes of model materials highlighting different orders of magnitude in size, different charge, and different hydrophobicity. It is expected that the technique will play a crucial role across scientific studies in numerous fields because no expensive or harsh reagents are required (in most cases) of the preparation steps and because it can take less than 30 min to fully prepare the loaded polymer capsules from the CaCO3 particle synthesis to the core removal. Finally, it is noted that because of the highly biocompatible nature of CaCO3, the core could be left in depending on the application.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Polymer‐Stabilized CaCO3 Particles: Submicrometer PSS–CaCO3 particles and CaCO3 particles stabilized with other polymers were obtained by the fast precipitation reaction between Ca(NO3)2 and Na2CO3, similar to previous reports. Solutions (20 × 10−3
Cargo Loading: A 100 μL of a 10 mg mL−1 solution of the polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 particles was diluted to 300 μL with ultrapure water and 200 μL of 1–10 mg mL−1 of cargo dispersed in ultrapure water was added. If the cargo was not readily available in ultrapure water, the pH was adjusted, or in the case of napthofluorescein, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used for loading. The solution was mixed vigorously for 1 min before three centrifugation/wash cycles using 2000 g were applied for the smaller particles and 600 g for the larger particles.
Polymer Capping and Core Removal: A 100 μL of a 10 mg mL−1 solution of the polymer‐stabilized CaCO3 particles was diluted to 300 μL with ultrapure water and 200 μL of 1 mg mL−1 polymer solution was added. Note that the polymers were dissolved in pH adjusted ultrapure water, or buffer other than acetate buffers when necessary, with the final pH of the polymer solution 0.5–1.5 pH units below the polymer pKa. The solution was mixed vigorously for 1 min before three centrifugation/wash cycles were applied. A 200 μL of 40 × 10−3
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Blaise Tardy, Henk Dam, Kristian Kempe, Jiwei Cui, Kang Liang, Yuan Ping, Olga Shimoni, Shota Sekiguchi, and Shen Tay for contribution of materials. This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) under the Australian Laureate Fellowship (F.C., FL120100030) and the Super Science Fellowship (F.C., FS110200025) schemes. This research was conducted and funded in part by the ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology (Project No. CE140100036).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Polymer microcapsules are of particular interest for applications including self‐healing coatings, catalysis, bioreactions, sensing, and drug delivery. The primary way that polymer capsules can exhibit functionality relevant to these diverse fields is through the incorporation of functional cargo in the capsule cavity or wall. Diverse functional and therapeutic cargo can be loaded into polymer capsules with ease using polymer‐stabilized calcium carbonate (CaCO3) particles. A variety of examples are demonstrated, including 15 types of cargo, yielding a toolbox with effectively 500+ variations. This process uses no harsh reagents and can take less than 30 min to prepare, load, coat, and form the hollow capsules. For these reasons, it is expected that the technique will play a crucial role across scientific studies in numerous fields.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio‐Nano Science and Technology and the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
2 Vascular Biotechnology Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
3 Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium