1. Introduction
Banana black weevil (BW), Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar, 1824; Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is the key pest of banana plant crops [1,2,3,4]. BW causes more damage to banana crops than any other arthropod pest. BW infestations alter nutrient and water uptakes, causing a decline in plant vigor, size and toppling [3,4,5]. C. sordidus originates from South-East Asia [6] and has been invading Central Africa, Central America, the Pacific Islands and all regions where bananas are cultivated between 30°N and 31°S latitudes [7]. In Europe, BW is present in Madeira (Portugal) [8] and the Canary Islands (Spain) [9]. C. sordidus can cause losses from 30% up to 90% of the total banana crop yield production in intense outbreaks [10,11,12].
BW adults are active at night and prefer a humid environment, thriving in crop residues. They are slow-moving and poor flyers despite its functional wings. Therefore, the pest dispersion is mainly passive occurring through the handling of infested plant material. Females have low fertility, laying 1–4 eggs/week with considerable intervals during their adult life and, reaching 10–270 total eggs in their lifetime [13]. BW larvae go through 5–8 stages and the post-embryonic development is completed within 5–7 weeks under tropical conditions [13]. BW larvae damage the banana plants, boring the corm for feeding [14]. BW tunnels reduce nutrient absorption and can weaken the plant. This leads to reductions in fruit production or falling of bunches [13]. In massive infestations, plants can rot and die.
Banana weevils have several predators and pathogens. BW pathogens include entomopathogenic fungi (Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana) and nematodes. B. bassiana [(Balsamo) Vuillemin, 1912] and M. anisopliae [(Metschnikoff) Sorokin, 1883] of the Hypocreales (Ascomycota) have been used for the biological control of important agricultural pests [15,16,17,18]. These fungi have potential for C. sordidus biocontrol under laboratory [19] and field [5] conditions.
Pochonia chlamydosporia [(Goddard) Zare and Gams, 2001] is a nematophagous fungus very close phylogenomically to M. anisopliae [20,21]. P. chlamydosporia parasitizes nematode eggs and females [22,23,24], it is also an endophyte [25,26] and a soil fungus [27,28]. Therefore, it has been used as a biocontrol agent of cyst and root knot nematodes [29].
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are solid and liquid carbon-based substances that enter the gaseous phase by vaporization at 20 °C and 0.01 kPa [30]. Most VOCs are typically lipophilic liquids with high vapor pressure [31]. The emission of volatile organic compounds plays essential ecological and physiological roles for many organisms, such as fungi which release a broad spectrum of VOCs [32,33]. Fungi produce volatile compounds through their metabolic pathways [34,35] and they appear as intermediate and final products from both primary and secondary metabolism [36]. Fungal VOCs belong to different chemical groups such as monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenes, alcohols, aldehydes, aromatic compounds, esters, furans, hydrocarbons, ketones and others [31,33,37]. Since VOCs can spread through the atmosphere and the soil, they are ideal semiochemicals [38]. The aggregation pheromone sordidine, isolated from BW males [39,40] is used in insect traps as it is attractant for both sexes. BW adults are attracted to (2R,5S)-theaspirane, the active component of senescent banana leaves [41].
VOCs mediate interactions between organisms such as fungal–insect interactions [42]. Fungal production of VOCs is highly dynamic. The VOC profile of a species or strain may vary according to substrate, culture age, nutrient type, temperature and other environmental parameters [43,44,45]. VOCs profiles of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae have been correlated with their pathogenic activity [46]. Some fungal VOCs may have insecticidal or repellent activities. Muscodor spp. produces nitrosoamide which kills insects [47]. Naphthalene produced by Muscodor vitigenus (Daisy, Strobel, Ezra and W.M. Hess, 2002) is an insect repellent [48]. Some insects of various orders avoid fungal species of the Hypocreales, detecting their VOCs and negatively responding to them [42,49,50,51]. In addition, fungal VOCs show neurotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen, 1830) [52].
In this work, we isolate naturally occurring entomopathogenic fungi from banana soils to study their capability as biocontrol agents of BW. We analyze their VOC production to find a new approach for BW management. We also study BW behavior with these VOCs, searching for a repellent to be applied in the field. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Fungal Isolation from Banana Plantations Soils using Insect Baits
Soil samples from banana fields in the Canary Islands (Spain) (Table S1) were sampled as in Asensio et al. [53]. For each site, 2 kg of soil was collected from three points, one meter apart from each banana rhizome and between them. Soil was collected from 0–20 cm depth and stored at 4 °C until used.
We used Galleria mellonella (Linnaeus, 1756; Bichosa and Cebos Ramiro, Spain) larvae as living baits for entomopathogenic fungi (EF) isolation. Soil samples were screened using a one-millimeter sieve and then dried at room temperature. Forty grams of dried soil from each sample were placed in a Petri dish. Three Petri dishes (replicates) were prepared per soil sample. Ten milliliters of sterile distilled water (SDW) were then added to each Petri dish. Eight living larvae (L3-L4) of G. mellonella were buried per plate. Plates were sealed with Parafilm and incubated at 25 °C for 15 days in the dark. Plates were shaken periodically to favor contact between larvae and soil. Insects recovered from soil were surface-sterilized with 4% sodium hypochlorite for one minute. Insects were then rinsed three times in SDW (5 min each), and finally dried on sterile filter paper and placed in moist chambers for a week at 25 °C in the dark (five larvae per plate). Larvae were then plated on corn meal agar (CMA) with 50 μg/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, 50 μg/mL rose Bengal and 1 mg/mL Triton X-100 [54]. Fungi on the larvae were isolated on CMA.
2.2. Morphological Identification of EF Isolates
Fifteen-day-old colonies from fungal isolates were used to prepare micro-cultures [55]. Fungal isolates were inoculated in 1 × 1 cm fragments of axenic CMA at their ends on sterile slides. CMA fragments were laid on top with a coverslip and placed in moist chambers. In this way, isolates were determined up to genus level using general taxonomic references [27,56,57].
2.3. Molecular Identification of Fungal Strains
EF isolates were grown in potato dextrose broth (PDB) for 5 days at 22 °C (120 rpm), filtered and dried to obtain mycelia samples, then they were frozen (liquid nitrogen), lyophilized and stored at −20 °C until use. For DNA extraction, we used 30 mg of mycelium for the acetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) method of O’Donnell et al. [58]. DNA quality was assessed with a ND-1000 Nanodrop (Wilmington, USA).
Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) region [59,60] and the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1α gen) [61] of EF isolates were amplified and sequenced. Primers used were: ITS-1F (5′TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG3′) and ITS-4 (5′TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC3′); EFI-728F (5′CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG3′) and TEF-1R (5′GCCATCCTTGGGAGATACCAGC3′) fungal specific primers (0.5 μM). PCR was performed with the kit TaqPolimerase 2X (VWR) using the following PCR program: 95 °C for two minutes for the initial denaturation and, 35 cycles of 60 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C and 45 s at 72 °C to facilitate polymerization, and finally a five minutes extension at 72 °C was included. PCR products were purified using GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific, Fisher) and sent for sequencing. We obtained consensus sequences of the amplified regions of the fungal strains, and they were compared by homology with other sequences in the NCBI database. Match sequences with homology values higher than 95% were used to assign the associated species checked in the NCBI database. The results were crosschecked with identifications obtained microscopically.
2.4. Pathogenicity Assays
The virulence of EF isolated from banana soils was evaluated by pathogenicity bioassays. We also included in the bioassays B. bassiana 203 strain (from naturally infected Rynchophorous ferrugineus (Olivier, 1790) adults in SE Spain, Daimès, Elche; CBS 121097) [62]. We evaluated EF virulence by testing the survival of G. mellonella larvae inoculated with a given strain of EF under laboratory conditions. Fifteen living larvae of G. mellonella were inoculated following the method of Ricaño et al. [63]. In the CMA plates bioassays, five larvae (L3-L4) were placed in 9 cm Petri dishes with a 24-day colony of each EF isolate grown in CMA. Insects were kept on the plate for 5 min, shaking the plate regularly to favor contact with the fungus. For controls, plates with non-inoculated CMA medium were used. Pathogenicity assays were carried out in duplicate. Insects were then placed in 9-cm Petri dishes in a moist chamber to evaluate the mortality every 12h up to 20 days. In addition to this, dipping bioassays were carried out too, by making a 10-mL solution of 107 conidia/mL and dipping the insects in the solution for five seconds. In these tests, we used G. mellonella larvae and C. sordidus adults, fifteen individuals of each species. Mortality was scored daily for 20 days.
Mantel–Cox test (p < 0.05, log-rank method, survival percentage analysis) was performed in GraphPad Prism 6 (version 6.01, 2012) using insect survival data. The virulence of EF isolates was evaluated by analyzing the evolution of the survival rate of the insects inoculated with EF versus the control treatment. Survival percentage curves were generated, and significant differences were studied and indicated. 2.5. Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis
Our two more virulent EF strains (B. bassiana 1TS11 and M. robertsii 4TS04; Table 1) and B. bassiana 203 were used for experiments. The nematophagous fungus P. chlamydosporia 123 strain (from eggs of Heterodera avenae (Wollenweber, 1924) in SW Spain, Seville; ATCC No. MYA-4875; CECT No. 20929) [64] was also included. Fungi were grown in 250-mL flasks with 75 g of autoclaved rice (Oryza sativa cv Redondo (Linnaeus, 1753); commercial animal food) [62] for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 days at room temperature. Uninoculated rice was used as control.
GC/MS of fungal cultures was carried out using Solid-Phase Micro Extraction (SPME), with a fused silica fiber (1 cm; ∅ 0.110 mm) [65]. Cultures were processed for VOCs identification at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 days after inoculation (dai). For each strain, five grams were sampled and placed in a vial (HS, crimb, FB, 20 mL, clr, cert, 100 PK, Agilent Technologies) hermetically capped by a pressure plug with a plastic membrane. Samples were then placed individually in a 60 °C thermostatic bath. The absorption of VOCs occurred by exposing the fiber of the holder to the headspace of the vial for 15 min. The holder was inserted into the GC injector (Agilent 5973 Network Mass Spectrometer - Agilent model 6890N gas chromatograph; column: DB624 30 m, 0.25 mm ID 1.4 µm, J&W Scientific) for a 4 min desorption at 150 °C in a splitless mode. The chromatography program used had an initial temperature of 35 °C for 5 min and a 3 °C/min increasing curve until 150 °C, then at that temperature for 1 min. Afterwards, a 5 °C/min increasing curve until 250 °C was used to finish the analysis (total analysis time was 38 min). The ionization source for electronic impact was 70 eV at 230 °C. A simple quadrupole was used as a detector at 150 °C. Wiley275 library was used for identifying VOCs.
After each chromatography run, the software generated a chromatogram and a list of VOCs. Data obtained were processed in order to obtain, for every strain, a list of the Total-VOCs characteristic of each fungus (T-VOCs) which a match ≥50% with the database entries. A second set included Major-VOCs (M-VOCs), which a match ≥50% and a peak-height (relative abundance) >100.000 ppm. Finally, the third set, which contained minor-VOCs (m-VOCs) for the compounds that have a match ≥50% and a peak-height between 100.000 and 20.000 ppm. 2.6. Olfactometer Bioassays BW adults were collected from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) using pheromone traps and kept in plastic boxes (40 × 30 × 21 cm) at 28 ± 0.5 °C in the dark. The plastic boxes contained a small container with distilled water, to maintain a moist environment, with a photoperiodic condition of 0:24 (L:D). Healthy BW adults collected from the field were used for bioassays. Fresh banana corm/pseudocorm (Musa sp.) pieces (ca. 16g/each) were used daily for olfactometer bioassays.
A two-way olfactometer (Figure S1) was used to evaluate the behavior of BW subjected to olfactory stimuli. At the end of the arms, two “odor chambers” [66] are placed, consisting of two glass tubes into which insert the olfactory stimuli to test. Tests were conducted by placing a single BW adult at the center of the straight arm. All insects tested had 10 min to move and make a choice or stay in the same place. After each test, the BW was stored for approximately one month, after that, individuals were changed for new ones. The olfactometer was rinsed after each test with ethanol, n-hexane and distilled water and dried with paper towels. Every test consisted of six replicates of 20 individuals each, which were reused every other time, from two boxes of 60 individuals each. The experiments were conducted with no airflow inside the olfactometer.
2.7. Environmental Conditions
In these tests, two conditions were analyzed, in which the attractant activity of the corm/pseudocorm was tested. We placed the natural attractant in one arm of the olfactometer, while nothing was placed in the other arm. We wanted to evaluate the effect of light (L) or darkness (D) on BW behavior and movement as BW mainly displays nocturnal habits [13]. Darkness tests were conducted in an off laminar flow hood covered with three layers of aluminum foil to ensure total darkness during the tests. Furthermore, starvation (S) was also tested. One population included BW fed ad libitum (No S), the other had BWs starved for at least a week (S). We evaluate the conditions in combination as follows: L-S, L-No S, D-S and D-No S. In this way, we can deduce in which conditions C. sordidus has the highest rate of movement for further bioassays.
2.8. Fungal VOCs Repellency
In this group, nine bioassays were conducted with starved BW in the dark (D-S). Seven fungal VOCs (C1-C7) (Table S2) and two BW repellents used in commercial banana plantations [67] (garlic, G. and colloidal Sulphur, S.) were analyzed. Styrene (C1) and benzothiazole (C2) were selected because they repel R. ferrugineus [68]. B. bassiana 203 and 1TS11 both produced C1 and C2. Camphor (C3) and borneol (C4) were chosen for their repellence to insects [69,70,71]. C4 is produced by the B. bassiana strains and C3 only by B. bassiana 1TS11. We selected 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5) and 1-octen-3-ol (C6) from M. robertsii and P. chlamydosporia because of their high abundance (M-VOCs). Finally, 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) was present in all fungal strains studied and in high abundance. Samples of all pure compounds were obtained from SIGMA-ALDRICH.
For the tests, in one arm of the olfactometer a piece of fresh corm/pseudocorm was placed, on the other arm 0.5 mL (C1, C2, C5, C6 and C7) or 0.5 g (C3 and C4) of the pure compounds were inoculated by placing them in a miracloth (Merck KGaA) envelop (3.5 × 2.5 cm) with 2 g of silica gel (60A; 70-200μ, Carlo Erba). The volume or weight of the compound was added directly to the silica gel. For the fresh garlic slices (local supermarket) and the colloidal Sulphur (SIPCAM JARDÍN S.L.) 15.6 g of each substance was used. 2.9. Pheromone and Fungal VOCs Attractiveness
In these tests, four bioassays were carried out under D-S conditions to evaluate a sordidine-based pheromone (ECOSordidine30; ECOBERTURA, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain) used in field traps. This aggregation pheromone, isolated from BW males [39,40] is an attractant for both sexes. The pheromone was compared in the olfactometer individually with no stimulus and C1 and C2, as described above. The pheromone concentration used was 1/16 (1.7e-4 mL/cm2) of the concentration of the commercial formulation (0.27 mL/cm2). Commercial pheromone caused BW overstimulation and prevented movement.
Other bioassays were carried out in the same conditions as the previous ones. In this case, in one arm of the olfactometer, corm/pseudocorm was placed, whereas, in the other arm it was the pheromone alone or with C1 and C2. 2.10. Olfactometer Bioassays Data Treatment for Analysis
BWs could go to the arm containing corm/pseudocorm or pheromone—E1 (Figure S1). Others could go to the arm containing fungal VOCs, pheromone or no-stimulus—E2. Lastly, they could not move—EC. This triple ethological response has been evaluated with empirical mobility indexes, to summarize BWs behavior in the tests and to use them in the chi-square statistical tests.
We assume that a BW population placed in the olfactometer in the absence of stimuli would be uniformly distributed in the three possible choices maintaining a 1:1:1 (nE1 = nE2 = nEc) ratio relationship. We also consider that the individuals remaining in the EC either, not respond to the stimulus or, are repelled by the substance tested. Therefore, three mobility rates can be formulated as follows: IE1 = nE1/N, IE2 = nE2/N and IEC = nEC/N. Where, nE1 = number of individuals choosing E1, nE2 = number of individuals choosing E2, nEC = number of individuals remaining in EC and N = total number of individuals tested. Finally, to obtain an index that takes into consideration all these relationships between groups of individuals, we have summarized theses rates into one, Index of Movement (IM): IM = (IE1 + IE2)/IEC = (nE1 + nE2)/nEC. Where, 0 < IM < +∞, with nEC ≠ 0. The closer to 0 the Index of Movement value is, the higher the motionless portion of the population is. Each of the six replicates (N = 20) originate an IM. ANOVA tests were conducted on all olfactometer bioassays using index data on the statistical software Rstudio. 3. Results 3.1. Entomopathogenic Fungi are Present in Soil from Banana Plantations
Soil sampling was performed in the Canary Islands where banana is the major crop. The number of samples collected per island was proportional to the area devoted to banana cultivation. In Tenerife, the largest island, with banana as a major crop, the most soil samples (23 out of 48) were taken. From 48 soil samples, we have detected the presence of entomopathogenic fungi (EF) in six soil samples (12.5%). All EF strains were isolated from soils of Tenerife (Table 1). All field locations with EF are under Integrated Production certification and drip irrigated (Table S1). We have isolated five fungal species from banana soils: Beauveria bassiana (1TS11) and B. pseudobassiana (19TS04), Metarhizium robertsii (4TS04) and M. brunneum (8TS21) and three Simplicillium lamellicola strains (2TS05, 5TS08 and 6TS01). We have identified them morphologically and by ITS and TEF1α sequencing. NCBI accession numbers are in Table 1. These isolates are deposited into the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT). Phylogenetic analysis confirms our species prediction (Figure S2).
3.2. Beauveria spp. from Banana Soils Are More Virulent than Metarhizium spp. to C. Sordidus
The pathogenicity of EF isolates increased with humidity. G. mellonella larvae died four days faster under higher humidity conditions, studied by keeping the larvae under moist chamber conditions versus no extra humidity conditions (Figure 1A and Figure S3). We established these conditions to evaluate EF pathogenicity in further experiments.
B. bassiana 1TS11 and B. pseudobassiana 19TS04 were the most virulent strains, followed by B. bassiana 203 and M. robertsii 4TS04. These fungi induced G. mellonella full mortality after two days (Figure 1A). The mortality of larvae inoculated with S. lamellicola 2TS05 or 5TS08 did not differ significantly from controls. Therefore, these isolates were not included in further experiments.
In the G. mellonella dipping test, the most virulent strain was M. robertsii 4TS04, followed by B. bassiana 1TS11 and B. pseudobassiana 19TS04, with full mortality in less than five days (Figure 1B). Therefore, we selected these strains to analyze their VOCs.
In the C. sordidus pathogenicity test, the most virulent strain was B. pseudobassiana 19TS04, followed by B. bassiana 1TS11. BW adults were more resistant to EF than G. mellonella larvae. This is perhaps because BW cuticle is harder than that of G. mellonella larvae (Figure 1C). We also tested BW larvae sensitivity to EF. BW larvae exposed to B. pseudobassiana 19TS04 and M. robertsii 4TS04 fungal colonies died three days before the uninoculated larvae (Figure 1D). We noticed that BW larvae were very sensitive to manipulation and difficult to rear under laboratory conditions, so we made bioassays with a selection of EF only.
3.3. VOCs Production by Fungal Pathogens of Invertebrates
To evaluate VOCs, we selected the most pathogenic strains (B. bassiana 1TS11 and M. robertsii 4TS04) against G. mellonella larvae and BW adults. We also studied B. bassiana 203 isolated from red palm weevil [62] and the nematopathogenous fungus P. chlamydosporia 123 [64]. We found 97 volatile organic compounds produced by these fungal strains, during 60 days of growth (Figure 2, Table S3). Only 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) and 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol were produced by all fungal strains. P. chlamydosporia 123 was the largest VOCs producer with 52 unique compounds, followed by M. robertsii 4TS04 (13), B. bassiana 1TS11 (8) and B. bassiana 203 (5).
Regarding the most commonly produced VOCs, both B. bassiana strains (203 and 1TS11) emitted borneol (C4) and 1-octene. In the case of M. robertsii 4TS04 and B. bassiana 1TS11, they both produced 1,3-octadiene and (+-)-gymnomitrene. Regarding M. robertsii 4TS04 and P. chlamydosporia 123, they displayed the highest number of VOCs in common, such as 1-octen-3-ol (C6), 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-benzene and 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5). B. bassiana 1TS11 and P. chlamydosporia 123, had only one VOC in common, 1-methylallyl(cyclooctatetraene)titanium. M. robertsii 4TS04 and B. bassiana 203, had only 4-fluoro-1,2-xylene in common. Finally, both B. bassiana 203 and P. chlamydosporia 123 emitted 2,4-octadiene, β-pinene, α-pinene and 3-octanone.
B. bassiana 203 generated 16 compounds characteristic of its metabolic profile (Figure 2). Of these, two were M-VOCs and the other five were m-VOCs (Table 2). 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) and borneol (C4) were present in all samplings carried out during the 60 days of growth of the fungus. Most of the compounds detected were found 20 days after inoculation (dai).
B. bassiana 1TS11 also generated 16 VOCs (Figure 2). Two belonged to the M-VOCs category, whereas nine were m-VOCs (Table 3). 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) was present in five of the samplings. Borneol (C4) was detected 10, 20, 40 and 50 dai. Benzothiazole (C2) was a m-VOC detected 20 dai only. Most compounds detected were found in the first sampling.
M.robertsii 4TS04 showed 24 VOCs in its metabolic profile (Figure 2). Of these, four were M-VOCs and eight were m-VOCs (Table 4). 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) was found from 10 to 30 dai, whereas 1-octen-3-ol (C6) was detected from 10 to 40 dai. 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5) was only found at the first sampling. Most compounds were detected at 50 dai.
P. chlamydosporia 123 showed 66 VOCs (Figure 2). Of these, 12 compounds were M-VOCs and 42 compounds belonged to the m-VOCs (Table 5). 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5) was found in the six samplings carried out during the growth of the fungus, while 1-octen-3-ol (C6) was detected 10, 20, 30 and 60 dai. 3-octanone was present 20, 40 and 50 dai, and 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7) was found only at the first two samplings. Most compounds identified were detected at 40 and 50 dai.
3.4. Olfactometer Bioassays
3.4.1. Effects of Environmental Conditions on BW Mobility
Environmental conditions interfered with BW mobility (Figure 3) (χ2 = 17.952; df = 6; p-value = 0.006352; ANOVA: F-value = 3.305; p-value = 0.0413). The nocturnal activity of C. sordidus is evident from the higher mobility shown by individuals tested in the darkness, D-S and D-No S (IMD-S = 0.53 and IMD-No S = 0.48) compared to those conducted in the presence of light, L-S and L-No S (IML-S = 0.36 and IML-No S = 0.22). Individuals exposed to darkness-starvation conditions (D-S) showed the greatest mobility, reflected in the highest Index of Mobility (IM) (IMD-S = 0.53), with significant differences (p < 0.05) with respect to light-no starvation conditions (L-No S) with the lowest IM (IML-No S = 0.22). Therefore, BW olfactometer bioassays (next section) were performed under darkness and starvation.
3.4.2. Fungal VOCs Repel BW
C. sordidus mobility was influenced by fungal VOCs (Table S2) and other compounds (technical repellents) tested (Figure 4A) (χ2 = 60.881; df = 18; p-value = 1.473e-6; ANOVA: F-value = 3.388; p-value = 0.0026). All fungal VOCs and technical repellents, except for colloidal Sulphur (S.), reduced BW movement compared to the control (corm only, no repellents). However, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed only between the compound 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7). Sulphur showed the highest IM (IMS = 0.64) compared to the control (IMD-S = 0.53), being significantly different (p < 0.05) with 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5) and C7. The compound that mostly reduced BW mobility was C7 (IMC7 = 0.11) produced by all fungal strains studied, followed by C5 (IMC5 = 0.18) produced by P. chlamydosphoria 123 and M. robertsii 4TS04 only. Benzothiazole (C2) (IMC2 = 0.26) and styrene (C1) (IMC1 = 0.28) were the following ones, showing a decrease in BW mobility.
3.4.3. Fungal VOCs Mask Pheromone and Banana Corm BW Attractiveness
C. sordidus behavior was influenced by sordidine (BW aggregation pheromone, P), styrene and benzothiazole (C1 and C2, respectively fungal VOCs) (Figure 4B) (χ2 = 23.221; df = 4; p-value = 1.14e-4). C1 and C2 significantly modified C. sordidus mobility with respect to P (ANOVA: F-value = 9.769; p-value = 0.0019). VOCs presence generated an IM (IMPC1 = 0.03 and IMPC2 = 0.04) lower than that of the pheromone (IMP = 0.18). C1 and C2 therefore repelled BW.
Fungal VOCs C1 and C2, combined with pheromone (IMC-PC1 = 0.07 and IMC-PC2 = 0.02) masked pheromone BW attractiveness. This was reflected by the lower IM of BW of VOCs-pheromone stimuli compared to pheromone alone (IMC-P = 1.18) versus corm (Figure 4C) (χ2 = 123.43; df = 4; p-value = 2.2e-16; ANOVA: F-value = 54.13; p-value = <0.0001).
4. Discussion
Bananas are essential for food security in tropical and subtropical countries, being one of the best-known, consumed and cultivated fruits [72,73]. C. sordidus is a major pest of banana. It causes more crop destruction than any other arthropod pest in all banana producing countries [5]. BW-resistant banana plants do not cover main commercial cultivars, making this pest a severe problem [74,75,76].
Biological control agents such as entomopathogenic fungi could be used for BW management [5,77]. However, this pest has nocturnal habits and passes most of its life cycle within the banana plant and hiding in the leaf litter of the crop, where it is hard to target using EF conidia. As reported in Lopes et al. [78], C. sordidus adults seem to be less sensitive to EF than many other insects: they performed virulence analysis with indigenous and exotic isolates and observed a lower virulence and recovery rate of the local species.
In this work, we take an alternative approach for BW biomanagement using fungal VOCs. BWs have efficient search mechanisms based on their antennae, specialized primary chemo and mechanoreceptors, which are crucial to ensure the survival and reproduction of BWs in the environment [13].
Fungi produce volatile compounds [34,35]. Some of them act as attractants and/or repellents for insects and other invertebrates [42,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. These compounds may generate alerts in the insect about the presence of possible partners, food, suitable places to lay their eggs or dangers that should be avoided. Therefore, any chemical that could interrupt and modify the behavior of the BW and in general its search ability for the host (Musa sp.) could serve as a tool for BW sustainable management.
We have isolated entomopathogenic fungi from banana crop soils in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain), in which BW infestations are documented, looking for VOCs repellent to BW. B. bassiana (1TS11) and M. robertsii (4TS04) from this survey, both pathogenic to BW, were selected for VOC analysis. These fungi are common in agricultural fields [79] and banana crops in particular [78]. Since B. bassiana 203 produces VOCs repellent to R. ferrugineus [68], it was included in this study. P. chlamydosporia 123, a nematophagous fungus closely related to M. anisopliae [20,21], with a large array of secondary metabolites [80] was also tested for VOCs production. Genomic studies support the idea that some Metarhizium species and P. chlamydosporia have a single ancestral joint [21].
These fungi produce a total of 97 VOCs. 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7), a major VOC produced by all fungal strains, was tested on C. sordidus. This M-VOC, also produced by other fungi [81], mostly reduces BW mobility among seven VOCs tested. 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5) from P. chlamydosporia and M. robertsii cultures is the second most repellent VOC to C. sordidus.
Camphor (C3) and borneol (C4) produced by B. bassiana and B. pseudobassiana, show a moderate reduction in BW movement. These are known insect repellents [69,70,71,82]. 1-octen-3-ol (C6), responsible for the odor of many fungi [83,84], is a milder repellent to C. sordidus.
Styrene (C1) and benzothiazole (C2), are also repellent to C. sordidus. They can reduce banana corm and pheromone (sordidine) attractiveness to BW. 5. Conclusions In this work, we have identified new VOCs from EF and a nematophagous fungus, that can be used as BW repellents. 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7), 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5), styrene (C1), benzothiazole (C2), camphor (C3), borneol (C4) and 1-octen-3-ol (C6) reduce BW mobility and can be, therefore, considered for BW management. In addition, C1 and C2 mask sordidine, a commercial BW aggregation pheromone. Tests should be conducted to determine the effect of selected VOCs as BW repellents in the field. The use of VOCs, plus slow-release polymer matrices, would improve VOCs’ performance and durability in the field. The implementation of the technologies associated with the dispersion of these repellents could produce advancements in the agrobiotechnological sustainability of the world banana cultivation. The economic importance of BW at a global level justifies the continuation of research in the identification of new molecules and technologies for the genesis of these new means for bio-management. Managing C. sordidus, in an integrated way, could contribute to the increase in banana production, significantly contributing to the increase in global food production, given the extent and importance of this crop. 6. Patents The results regarding fungal VOCs have been patented in the Spanish Office of Brands and Patents (OEPM) with patent number P201930831, with Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca, Ana Lozano-Soria, Ugo Picciotti, Federico Lopez-Moya and Javier Lopez-Cepero as inventors.
Figure 1. Entomopathogenic fungi isolated from banana crop soils are pathogenic over G. mellonella larvae and C. sordidus (n = 15). (a) Beauveria spp. and M. robertsii isolates are the most virulent on the larvae in the CMA plate bioassay. (b) In the dipping bioassay at 107 conidia/mL the most virulent fungi are Beauveria spp. and M. robertsii. (c) Beauveria spp. isolated from banana crop soils of Tenerife are more virulent than M. robertsii 4TS04 on C. sordidus adults. (d) Entomopathogenic fungi isolated from banana crop soils are pathogenic over C. sordidus larvae. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001) respect to the control.
Figure 2. P. chlamydosporia 123 is the fungus that produces the most VOCs, followed by M. robertsii 4TS04. Only two compounds are produced by all the fungi analyzed by SPME-GC/MS. Abbreviations: M.r 4TS04 = M. robertsii 4TS04, B.b 1TS11 = B. bassiana 1TS11, B.b 203 = B. bassiana 203 and P.c 123 = P. chlamydosporia 123.
Figure 3. Darkness and starvation are the conditions that generate the most movement on C. sordidus (BW), they are the best environmental conditions for analyzing the mobility of BW in olfactometer assays. Abbreviations: L-NS = Light and no starvation, L-S = Light and starvation, D-NS = Darkness and no starvation and D-S = Darkness and starvation. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Evaluation of the mobility of C. sordidus (BW) subjected to different olfactory stimuli. (a) Effect of fungal VOCs and other compounds (technical repellents) versus no stimuli. C7 and C5 are the ones that reduced the most BW mobility. Abbreviations: Co. = Corm, C1 = styrene, C2 = benzothiazole, C3 = camphor, C4 = borneol, C5 = 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene, C6 = 1-octen-3-ol, C7 = 3-cyclohepten-1-one, G = garlic, S = colloidal Sulphur. (b) Effect of fungal VOCs on C. sordidus pheromone attractiveness. C1 and C2 mask pheromone attractiveness on BW. Co. = Corm vs. no stimuli; P. = Pheromone vs. no stimuli; P.-C1 = Pheromone vs. C1; P.-C2 = Pheromone vs. C2 (c) Effect of banana corm, BW aggregation pheromone and fungal VOCs attractiveness to C. sordidus. C1 and C2 mask banana corm and pheromone attractiveness on BW. Co. = Corm vs. no stimuli; Co.-P. = Corm vs. Pheromone; Co.-P.-C1 = Corm vs. Pheromone + C1; Co.-P.-C2 = Corm vs. Pheromone + C2. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
Fungi spp. | Code | CECT Number | NCBI Number | Soil Code | Fungal Genera | Blastn | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITS | Tef1a | ||||||
Simplicillium lamellicola | A.l.6TS01 | CECT 21125 | MK156720.1 | TS01 | Simplicillium sp. | Simplicillium lamellicola | - |
Metarizhium robertsii | M.r.4TS04 | CECT 21126 | MK156715.1 | TS04 | Metarhizium sp. | Metarhizium robertsii | M. robertsii |
Beauveria pseudobassiana | B.p.19TS04 | CECT 21122 | MK156716.1 | TS04 | Beauveria sp. | Beauveria pseudobassiana | B. pseudobasiana |
Simplicillium lamellicola | A.l.2TS05 | CECT 21123 | MK156718.1 | TS05 | Simplicillium sp. | Simplicillium lamellicola | - |
Simplicillium lamellicola | A.l.5TS08 | CECT 21124 | MK156719.1 | TS08 | Simplicillium sp. | Simplicillium lamellicola | - |
Beauveria bassiana | B.b.1TS11 | CECT 21121 | MK156717.1 | TS11 | Beauveria sp. | Beauveria bassiana | B. bassiana |
Metarhizium brunneum | M.b.8TS21 | - | MT703853 | TS21 | Metarhizium sp. | Metarhizium brunneum | M. brunneum |
Beauveria bassiana 203 | 10d | 20d | 30d | 40d | 50d | 60d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-VOCs | ||||||
3-cyclohepten-1-one | X | X | X | X | X | X |
4-fluoro-1,2-xylene | X | |||||
m-VOCs | ||||||
p-Trimethylsilyloxyphenyl-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)ethane | X | |||||
Borneol | X | X | X | X | X | X |
3-octanone | X | |||||
(2R*,6R*,8AS*)-6-hydroxyedulan | X | |||||
β-pinene | X |
Beauveria bassiana 1TS11 | 10d | 20d | 30d | 40d | 50d | 60d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-VOCs | ||||||
1,3-octadiene | X | |||||
3-cyclohepten-1-one | X (m-VOCs) | X | X | X | X | |
m-VOCs | ||||||
Methyl-1,4-dioxide-pyrazine | X | |||||
2-methyl-2-bornene | X | |||||
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol | X | |||||
2,2,4,4,6,8,8-heptamethyl-nonane | X | |||||
1-methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole | X | |||||
Borneol | X | X | X | X | ||
Benzothiazole | X | |||||
5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2(5H)-furanone | X | |||||
(+-)-gymnomitrene | X |
Metarizhium robertsii 4TS04 | 10d | 20d | 30d | 40d | 50d | 60d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-VOCs | ||||||
3-cyclohepten-1-one | X | X | X | |||
1-octen-3-ol | X(m-VOCs) | X | X | X(m-VOCs) | ||
4-fluoro-1,2-xylene | X | X | ||||
1,3-dimethoxy-benzene | X | |||||
m-VOCs | ||||||
1,3-octadiene | X | |||||
3,5-dimethyl-2-propylthiophene | X | |||||
1-β-pinene | X | |||||
1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-benzene | X | |||||
2-amino-3,5-dibromo-6-methylpyridine | X | |||||
4-octen-3-ol | X | |||||
2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-phenol | X | |||||
5-oxoisoboldine | X |
Pochonia clamydosphoria 123 | 10d | 20d | 30d | 40d | 50d | 60d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M-VOCs | ||||||
Dimethyldisulfide | X | X | ||||
3-methyl-2-pentanone | X | |||||
3-cyclohepten-1-one | X | X | ||||
Propyl-cyclohexane | X | |||||
Dimethyl-trisulfide | X | |||||
1-octen-3-ol | X | X | X | X | ||
3-octanone | X | X | X | |||
2-dodecanone | X | X | ||||
1-methylallyl(cyclooctatetraene)titanium | X | |||||
1-phenyl-2-propanone | X | X | ||||
1,3-dimethoxy-benzene | X | X | X | X | X | X |
β-elemene | X | |||||
m-VOCs | ||||||
2-butanone | X | X | ||||
3-methylbutanal | X | X | X | |||
3-hydroxy-2-butanone | X | |||||
2-methylbutanal | X | |||||
2,4-octadiene | X | |||||
4-methyl-3-hexanone | X | |||||
Nonane | X | |||||
(1-methylethenyl) cyclopropene | X | |||||
5-methyl-2-hexanone | X | |||||
2-butoxy-ethanol | X | |||||
Propionoin | X | X | ||||
2,4-dimethyl-3-hexene | X | |||||
3,4-dimethyl-2-hexene | X | |||||
Trans-3,4-dimethyl-2-hexene | X | |||||
β-pinene | X | |||||
Anisole | X | |||||
2-isopropyl-5-oxohexanal | X | |||||
6-methyl-2-heptanone | X | |||||
Trimethyl-pyrazine | X | |||||
2-methyl-2-bornene | X | |||||
2,4-dimethyl-methyl ester-hexanoic acid | X | |||||
1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-benzene | X | |||||
Isocyano-benzene | X | |||||
2-(2-ethoxyethoxy)-ethanol | X | X | ||||
2,4-dimethylfuran | X | |||||
2-dodecanone | X | X | ||||
2-methyl-2-(2-methyl-2-butenyl)-furan | X | |||||
Benzenemethanol | X | |||||
3-hydroxymandelic acid ethyl ester di-TMS | X | X | ||||
4-hydroxymandelic acid ethyl ester di-TMS | X | |||||
4-trimethylsilyl-9,9-dimethyl-9-silafluorene | X | |||||
6,7-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-1-benzopyran | X | |||||
Bicyclo[2 .2.1]heptane-2-carboxylic acid | X | |||||
2-amino-4-methylpyrimidine | X | |||||
2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-phenol | X | |||||
2-undecanone | X | |||||
2-octanone | X | |||||
1-ethyl-2-methyl-cyclohexane | X | |||||
16-oxosalutaridine | X | X | ||||
5-acetyl-2-hydrazino-4-methylpyridine | X | |||||
Cyclotetradecane | X | |||||
trans-β-farnesene | X |
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/11/8/509/s1, Table S1: Soil collection from banana fields in the Canary Islands. Figure S1: Two-way olfactometer structure. BW behavior in the olfactometer. Table S2: Fungal volatile organic compounds selected for the olfactometry bioassays. Figure S2: Molecular Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS region by Maximum Likelihood method. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X. Figure S3: B. pseudobassiana 19TS04, B. bassiana 1TS11, M. robertsii 4TS04, B. bassiana 203 and S. lamellicola 6TS01 are significantly virulent on G. mellonela larvae at room humidity conditions. Table S3. Volatile organic compounds produced by the fungi analyzed, in all the times measured.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.L.-S., U.P., F.L.-M. and L.V.L.-L.; validation, A.L.-S., U.P., F.L.-M. and L.V.L.-L.; formal analysis, A.L.-S. and U.P.; investigation, A.L.-S., U.P. and J.L.-C.; resources, A.L.-S., U.P. and J.L.-C.; data curation, A.L.-S. and U.P.; writing-original draft preparation, A.L.-S., U.P. and L.V.L.-L.; writing-review and editing, A.L.-S., U.P., F.L.-M., F.P. and L.V.L.-L.; visualization, A.L.-S.; supervision, F.L.-M. and L.V.L.-L.; project administration, L.V.L.-L.; funding acquisition, F.L.-M., J.L.-C. and L.V.L.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by H2020 European Project Microbial Uptakes for Sustainable management of major bananA pests and diseases with project number 727624.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank members of the Plant Pathology Laboratory of the University of Alicante, for their help and support. We thank technical support by Lizeth Y. Tabima Cubillos during her stay in the Plan Pathology Laboratory and Ana Piedra-Buena Diaz for her help and information about BW rearing and maintenance. This manuscript has been released as a pre-print at BioRxiv [85].
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
1. Ostmark, H.E. Economic insect pests of bananas. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1974, 19, 161-176.
2. Kennett, C.E.; Mcmurtry, J.A.; Beardsley, J.W. Biological Control in Subtropical and Tropical Crops. Handb. Biol. Control 1999, 1892, 713-742.
3. Dubois, T.; Gold, C.S.; Coyne, D.; Paparu, P.; Mukwaba, E.; Athman, S.; Adipala, S.K.E. Merging biotechnology with biological control: Banana Musa tissue culture plants enhanced by endophytic fungi. Uganda J. Agric. Sci. 2004, 9, 445-451.
4. Waweru, B.; Turoop, L.; Kahangi, E.; Coyne, D.; Dubois, T. Non-pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum endophytes provide field control of nematodes, improving yield of banana (Musa sp.). Biol. Control 2014, 74, 82-88.
5. Nankinga, C.M.; Moore, D. Reduction of banana weevil populations using different formulations of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2000, 10, 645-657.
6. Simmonds, N.W. Bananas, 2nd ed.; Tropical Agricultural Series; Longman: London, UK, 1966; p. 512.
7. Vilardebo, A. Le coefficient d'infestation, critère d'évaluation du degré d'attaques des bananeraies par Cosmopolites sordidus GERM. le charançon noir du bananier. Fruits 1973, 28, 417-426.
8. Yuasa, H. Cosmopolites sordidus Germ. found in the Bonin and Loochoo Islands. Oyo Kontyu 1939, 2, 116-118.
9. Carnero, H.A.; Padilla-Cubas, A.; Montesdeoca, M. Métodos alternativos para el control del picudo de la platanera Cosmopolites sordidus Germar, 1824 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Actividades del ICIA en Platanera 2002, 8, 75-82.
10. Carballo, M. Mortalidad de Cosmopolites sordidus con diferentes formulaciones de Beauveria bassiana. Manejo Integrado de Plagas (CATIE) 1998, 48, 45-48.
11. Musabyimana, T.; Saxena, R.C.; Kairu, E.W.; Ogol, C.P.K.O.; Khan, Z.R. Effects of Neem Seed Derivatives on Behavioral and Physiological Responses of the Cosmopolites sordidus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 449-454.
12. Muñoz Ruiz, C. Fluctuación poblacional del picudo negro (Cosmopolites sordidus Germar) del plátano (Musa AAB) en San Carlos, Costa Rica. Tecnol. Marcha 2007, 20, 24-41.
13. Gold, C.S.; Pena, J.E.; Karamura, E.B. Biology and integrated pest management for the banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2001, 6, 79-155.
14. Franzmann, B.A. Banana weevil borer in north Queensland. Qld. Agric. J. 1972, 98, 319-321.
15. De Faria, M.R.; Wraight, S.P. Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: A comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. Biol. Control 2007, 43, 237-256.
16. Güerri-Agulló, B.; López-Follana, R.; Asensio, L.; Barranco, P.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Use of a Solid Formulation of Beauveria bassiana for Biocontrol of the Red Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) Under Field Conditions in SE Spain. Fla. Entomol. 2011, 94, 737-747.
17. Vega, F.; Kaya, H. Insect Pathology Second Edition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; ISBN 978-0-12-384984-7.
18. Steinhaus, E.A. Disease in a Minor Chord: Being a Semihistorical and Semibiographical Account of a Period in Science When One Could Be Happily Yet Seriously Concerned with the Diseases of Lowly Animals without Backbones, Especially the Insects; The Ohio State University Press: Columbus, OH, USA, 1975; p. 488.
19. Mesquita, A.L.M.; Lucchini, F.; Alves, E.J.; Caldas, R.C. Influencia dos fatores ambientais no grau de parasitismo de Beauveria bassiana sobre Cosmopolites sordidus e Metamasius hemipterus, em cultivo da bananeira. Pesquisa andamento. 1981, 14, 4.
20. Larriba, E.; Jaime, M.D.L.A.; Carbonell-Caballero, J.; Conesa, A.; Dopazo, J.; Nislow, C.; Martín-Nieto, J.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Sequencing and functional analysis of the genome of a nematode egg-parasitic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2014, 65, 69-80.
21. Lin, R.; Liu, C.; Shen, B.; Bai, M.; Ling, J.; Chen, G.; Mao, Z. Analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Pochonia chlamydosporia suggests a close relationship to the invertebrate-pathogenic fungi in Hypocreales. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 5.
22. Willcox, J.; Tribe, H.T. Fungal parasitism in cysts of Heterodera. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1974, 62, 585-594.
23. De Leij, F.A.A.M.; Dennehy, J.A.; Kerry, B.R. The effect of temperature and nematode species on interactions between the nematophagous fungus Verticillium chlamydosporium and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). Nematologica 1992, 38, 65-79.
24. Bourne, J.M.; Kerry, B.R.; De Leij, F.A.A.M. The importance of the host plant on the interaction between root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. and the nematophagous fungus, Verticillium chlamydosporium Goddard. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1996, 6, 539-548.
25. Maciá-Vicente, J.G.; Jansson, H.B.; Talbot, N.J.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Real-time PCR quantification and live-cell imaging of endophytic colonization of barley (Hordeum vulgare) roots by Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 213-228.
26. Escudero, N.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Effects on plant growth and root-knot nematode infection of an endophytic GFP transformant of the nematophagous fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia. Symbiosis 2012, 57, 33-42.
27. Domsch, K.H.; Gams, W.; Anderson, T.-H. Compendium of soil fungi. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1993, 59, 1007.
28. Zare, R.; Gams, W.; Evans, H.C. A revision of Verticillium section Prostrata. V. The genus Pochonia, with notes on Rotiferophthora. Nova Hedwig. 2001, 73, 51-86.
29. Manzanilla-López, R.H.; Esteves, I.; Finetti-Sialer, M.M.; Hirsch, P.R.; Ward, E.; Devonshire, J.; Hidalgo-Díaz, L. Pochonia chlamydosporia: Advances and challenges to improve its performance as a biological control agent of sedentary endo-parasitic nematodes. J. Nematol. 2013, 45, 1-7.
30. Pagans, E.; Font, X.; Sánchez, A. Emission of volatile organic compounds from composting of different solid wastes: Abatement by biofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 131, 179-186.
31. Campos, V.P.; Silva Canuto De Pinho, R.; Freire, E.S. Volatiles produced by interacting microorganisms potentially useful for the control of plant pathogens. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2010, 34, 525-535.
32. Splivallo, R.; Ottonello, S.; Mello, A.; Karlovsky, P. Truffle volatiles: From chemical ecology to aroma biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 688-699.
33. Kramer, R.; Abraham, W.R. Volatile sesquiterpenes from fungi: What are they good for? Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 15-37.
34. Crespo, R.; Pedrini, N.; Juárez, M.P.; Bello, G.M.D. Volatile organic compounds released by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Microbiol. Res. 2006, 163, 148-151.
35. Müller, A.; Faubert, P.; Hagen, M.; Castell, W.; Polle, A.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Rosenkranz, M. Volatile profiles of fungi-chemotyping of species and ecological functions. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2013, 54, 25-33.
36. Korpi, A.; Järnberg, J.; Pasanen, A.L. Microbial volatile organic compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2009, 39, 139-193.
37. Splivallo, R.; Bossi, S.; Maffei, M.; Bonfante, P. Discrimination of truffle fruiting body versus mycelial aromas by stir bar sorptive extraction. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2584-2598.
38. Morath, S.U.; Hung, R.; Bennett, J.W. Fungal volatile organic compounds: A review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2012, 26, 73-83.
39. Budenberg, W.J.; Ndiege, I.O.; Karago, F.W. Evidence for volatile male-produced pheromone in banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus. J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19, 1905-1916.
40. Mori, K.; Nakayama, T.; Takikawa, H. Synthesis and absolute configuration of sordidin, the male-produced aggregation pheromone of the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3741-3744.
41. Abagale, S.A.; Woodcock, C.; Chamberlain, K.; Osafo-Acquaah, S.; van Emden, H.; Birkett, M.A.; Braimah, H. Attractiveness of host banana leaf materials to the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus in Ghana for development of field management strategies. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 549-555.
42. Yanagawa, A.; Yokohari, F.; Shimizu, S. The Role of Antennae in Removing Entomopathogenic Fungi from Cuticle of the Termite, Coptotermes formosanus. J. Insect Sci. 2009, 9, 1-9.
43. Pasanen, P.; Korpi, A.; Kalliokoski, P.; Pasanen, A.L. Growth and volatile metabolite production of Aspergillus versicolor inhouse dust. Environ. Int. 1997, 23, 425-432.
44. Nilsson, A.; Kihlstrom, E.; Lagesson, V.; Wessen, B.; Szponar, B.; Larsson, L.; Tagesson, C. Microorganisms and volatile organic compounds in airborne dust from damp residences. Indoor Air 2004, 14, 74-82.
45. Fiedler, N.; Laumbach, R.; Kelly-McNeil, K.; Lioy, P.; Fan, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Ottenweller, J.; Ohman-Strickland, P.; Kipen, H. Health effects of a mixture of indoor air volatile organics, their ozone oxidation products, and stress. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1542-1548.
46. Hussain, A.; Tian, M.Y.; He, Y.R.; Lei, Y.Y. Differential fluctuation in virulence and VOC profiles among different cultures of entomopathogenic fungi. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010, 104, 166-171.
47. Strobel, G.; Manker, D.; Mercier, J. Novel Endophytic Fungi and Methods of Use. U.S. Patent Pub. No. 0285543 A1, 11 November 2010.
48. Daisy, B.H.; Strobel, G.A.; Castillo, U.; Ezra, D.; Sears, J.; Weaver, D.K.; Runyon, J.B. Napthalene, an insect repellent, is produced by Muscodor vitigenus, a novel endophytic fungus. Microbiology 2002, 148, 3737-3741.
49. Meyling, N.V.; Pell, J.K. Detection and avoidance of an entomopathogenic fungus by a generalist insect predator. Ecol. Entomol. 2006, 31, 162-171.
50. Thompson, S.R.; Brandenburg, R.L.; Roberson, G.T. Entomopathogenic Fungi Detection and Avoidance by Mole Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36, 165-172.
51. Ormond, E.L.; Thomas, A.P.M.; Pell, J.K.; Freeman, S.N.; Roy, H.E. Avoidance of a generalist entomopathogenic fungus by the ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 77, 229-237.
52. Inamdar, A.A.; Masurekar, P.; Bennett, J.W. Neurotoxicity of fungal volatile organic compounds in Drosphilla melanogaster. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 117, 418-426.
53. Asensio, L.; Carbonell, T.; Lopez-Jimenez, J.A.; López-Llorca, L.V. Entomopathogenic fungi in soils from Alicante province (Spain). Span. J. Agric. Res. 2003, 1, 3745.
54. Lopez-Llorca, L.V.; Duncan, J.M. New media for the estimation of fungal infection in eggs of the cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae Woll. Nematologica 1986, 32, 486-490.
55. Gams, W.; Hoekstra, E.S.; Aptroot, A. CBS Course of Mycology, 4th ed.; Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: Baarn, The Netherlands, 1998.
56. Gams, W.; Van der Aa, H.A.; Van der Plaats-Niterink, A.J.; Samson, R.A.; Stalpers, J.A. CBS Course of Mycology, 3rd ed.; Centraalbureau voor schimmelcultures: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1987.
57. Lacey, L.A. Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; Volume V-1, pp. 153-185.
58. O'Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E.; Nirenberg, H.I. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 1998, 90, 465-493.
59. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 315-322.
60. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113-118.
61. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553-556.
62. Güerri-Agulló, B.; Gómez-Vidal, S.; Asensio, L.; Barranco, P.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Infection of the Red Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana: A SEM study. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2010, 73, 714-725.
63. Ricaño, J.; Güerri-Agulló, B.; Serna-Sarriás, M.J.; Rubio-Llorca, G.; Asensio, L.; Barranco, P.; López-Llorca, L.V. Evaluation of the pathogenicity of multiple isolates of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) on Rhynochophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera:Dryophthoridae) for the assessment of a solid formulation under simulated field conditions. Fla. Entomol. 2013, 96, 1311-1324.
64. Olivares-Bernabeu, C.M.; López-Llorca, L.V. Fungal egg-parasites of plant-parasitic nematodes from Spanish soils. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2002, 19, 104-110.
65. Purcaro, G.; Moret, S.; Conte, L.S. Microestrazione in fase solida (SPME). Campione L'analisi Chim. 2014, 177-214.
66. Bazzocchi, G.G.; Maini, S. Ruolo dei semiochimici volatili nella ricerca dell'ospite da parte del parassitoide Diglyphus isaea (Hymenoptera Eulophidae). Prove olfattometriche. Boll. dell'Istituto Entomol. G. Grandi Univ. Bologna 2000, 54, 143-154.
67. Lopez-Cepero, J.; COPLACA, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. Personal communication, 2019.
68. Lopez-Llorca, L.V.; Jalinas, J.; Marhuenda Egea, F.C. Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles del Hongo Entomopatógeno Beauveria bassiana Como Repelentes de Insectos. Spanish Patent of Invention P201631534, 9 February 2017.
69. Chokechaijaroenporn, O.; Bunyapraphatsara, N.; Kongchuensin, S. Mosquito Repellent Activities of Ocimum Volatile Oils. Phytomedicine 1994, 1, 135-139.
70. Obeng-Ofori, D.; Reichmuth, C.H.; Bekele, A.J.; Hassanali, A. Toxicity and protectant potential of camphor, a major component of essential oil of Ocimum kilimandscharicum, against four stored product beetles. Int. J. Pest Manag. 1998, 44, 203-209.
71. Rozman, V.; Kalinovic, I.; Korunic, Z. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 349-355.
72. Lescot, T. La diversité génétique des bananiers. FruiTrop 2011, 89, 58-62.
73. Ferri, D.V.; Munhoz, C.F.; Neves, P.M.O.; Ferracin, L.M.; Sartori, D.; Vieira, M.L.C.; Fungaro, M.H.P. Genetic Variability of Beauveria bassiana and a DNA Marker for Environmental Monitoring of a Highly Virulent Isolate Against Cosmopolites sordidus. Indian J. Microbiol. 2012, 52, 569-574.
74. Kiggundu, A.; Gold, C.S.; Labuschagne, M.T.; Vuylsteke, D.; Louw, S. Levels of host plant resistance to banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar) (Coleoptera:Curculionidae), in Ugandan Musa germplasm. Euphytica 2003, 133, 267-277.
75. Kiggundu, A.; Gold, C.S.; Labuschagne, M.T.; Vuylsteke, D.; Louw, S. Components of resistance to banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) in Musa germplasm in Uganda. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2007, 27-35.
76. Night, G.; Gold, C.S.; Power, A.G. Feeding behaviour and efficiency of banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) larvae on banana cultivars of varying resistance levels. J. Appl. Entomol. 2011, 135, 430-437.
77. Kaaya, G.P.; Seshu-Reddy, K.V.; Kokwaro, E.D.; Munyinyi, D.M. Pathogenicity of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Serratia marcescens to the banana weevil Cosmopolites sordidus. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1993, 3, 177-187.
78. Lopes, R.B.; Mesquita, A.L.M.; Tigano, M.S.; Souza, D.A.; Hajek, A.E. Diversity of indigenous Beauveria and Metarhizium spp. in a commercial banana field and their virulence toward Cosmopolites sordidus (Coleoptera:Curculionidae). Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 356-364.
79. Meyling, N.V.; Eilenberg, J. Occurrence and distribution of soil borne entomopathogenic fungi within a single organic agroecosystem. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 113, 336-341.
80. Niu, X.M. Secondary metabolites from Pochonia chlamydosporia and other species of Pochonia. In Perspectives in Sustainable Nematode Management Through Pochonia chlamydosporia Applications for Root and Rhizosphere Health; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 131-168.
81. Fischer, G.; Schwalbe, R.; Möller, M.; Ostrowski, R.; Dott, W. Species-specific production of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC) by airborne fungi from a compost facility. Chemosphere 1999, 39, 795-810.
82. Nerio, L.S.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E. Repellent activity of essential oils: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 372-378.
83. Wnuk, S.; Kinastowski, S.; Kaminski, E. Synthesis and analysis of l-octen-3-ol, the main flavour component of mushrooms. Food/Nahrung 1983, 27, 479-486.
84. Venkateshwarlu, G.; Chandravadana, M.V.; Tewari, R.P. Volatile flavour components of some edible mushrooms (Basidiomycetes). Flavour Fragr. J. 1999, 194, 191-194.
85. Lozano-Soria, A.; Picciotti, U.; Lopez-Moya, F.; Lopez-Cepero, J.; Porcelli, F.; Lopez-Llorca, L.V. Volatile organic compounds from entomopathogenic and nematophagous fungi, repel banana black weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus). BioRxiv 2020.
Ana Lozano-Soria1,*,†, Ugo Picciotti1,2,3,*,†, Federico Lopez-Moya1, Javier Lopez-Cepero4, Francesco Porcelli2 and Luis Vicente Lopez-Llorca1
1Department of Marine Science and Applied Biology, Laboratory of Plant Pathology, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain
2Department of Soil, Plant, and Food Sciences—(DiSSPA), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy
3Dyrecta Lab Istituto di Ricerca, 70014 Conversano, Bari, Italy
4Technical Department of Coplaca, 38001 Tenerife, Spain
*Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Fungal Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) repel banana black weevil (BW), Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar, 1824), the key-pest of banana [Musa sp. (Linnaeus, 1753)]. The entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana (Bb1TS11) and Metarhizium robertsii (Mr4TS04) were isolated from banana plantation soils using an insect bait. Bb1TS11 and Mr4TS04 were pathogenic to BW adults. Bb1TS11, Bb203 (from infected palm weevils), Mr4TS04 and the nematophagous fungus Pochonia clamydosporia (Pc123), were tested for VOCs production. VOCs were identified by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry–Solid-Phase Micro Extraction (GC/MS-SPME). GC/MS-SPME identified a total of 97 VOCs in all strains tested. Seven VOCs (styrene, benzothiazole, camphor, borneol, 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene, 1-octen-3-ol and 3-cyclohepten-1-one) were selected for their abundance or previous record as insect repellents. BW-starved adults in the dark showed the highest mobility to banana corm in olfactometry bioassays. 3-cyclohepten-1-one (C7), produced by all fungal strains, is the best BW repellent (p < 0.05), followed by 1,3-dimethoxy-benzene (C5). The rest of the VOCs have a milder repellency to BW. Styrene (C1) and benzothiazole (C2) (known to repel palm weevil) block the attraction of banana corm and BW pheromone to BW adults in bioassays. Therefore, VOCs from biocontrol fungi can be used in future studies for the biomanagement of BW in the field.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer