You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.
If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.
Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.
You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.
You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.
You might have access to the full article...
Try and log in through your institution to see if they have access to the full text.
The statements a domestic violence victim made in a 911 call and to police on the scene are admissible as excited utterances under the federal rules of evidence and as non-testimonial statements under Crawford, the en banc 6th Circuit has ruled.
The victim called 911, saying her mother's boyfriend pulled a gun on her. When the police arrived, she again exclaimed that the defendant had pulled a gun and was trying to kill her. Soon after the officers came on the scene,...
