Content area
Full Text
SPECIAL INDUSTRIES
Arecent taxpayer victory in Tax Court is the latest development in a long series of tax authorities addressing amounts paid in connection with credit and loan market transactions. In this case, the taxpayer treated loan purchase commitment fees it received as option premiums; see Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac), 125 TC No. 12 (2005). The taxpayer successfully argued that receipt of the fees did not trigger their inclusion in gross income.
Commitment Fees
In Freddie Mac, the question was whether the taxpayer properly treated certain payments it received from mortgage sellers. A mortgage originator could either commit to selling a mortgage to Freddie Mac at a specific price and pay a small application fee, or obtain pre-approval for a later purchase of a mortgage at a variable price (along with a degree of interest-rate risk protection) and pay a larger "commitment fee."
The commitment fee included both refundable and nonrefundable portions. Only the latter was at issue in the case. During the years in question (1985-1990), approximately 99% of the mortgage originators paying the commitment fee consummated a sale transaction by delivering a mortgage loan to Freddie Mac. Only approximately 1% failed to deliver a mortgage loan and forfeited the fee's refundable portion.
Fee Income vs. Option Premium
The IRS argued that the nonrefundable portion of the...